Yıl 2018, Cilt 8, Sayı 2, Sayfalar 427 - 440 2018-12-30

The Residue of Anthropocentrism in Heidegger’s Question after Technic

İbrahim Okan Akkın [1]

0 17

In his text, The Question Concerning Technology, Heidegger argues that modern mind is unaware of Being’s self-destining which determines Dasein’s relation to their own essence and that of other beings because it is in a delusion of being an ‘efficient cause’. A bluntness of this kind not only endangers human-freedom but also puts natural entities at the risk of losing their authenticity since the modern mode of production regards nature as a reserve that is constantly in the service of human-doings. Accordingly, the discussion carried out in this article is, despite his criticism of the conception of ‘agency’ underlying western metaphysics, whether or not Heidegger overcomes the problem of anthropocentrism in his own philosophy.

Heidegger, anthropocentrism, nature, Dasein, technology, technic, art
  • Brogan, W. A. (2007). The Intractable Interrelationship of Physis and Techne in Heidegger's Philosophy. Heidegger and the Greeks. (Eds. D. A. Hyland & J. P. Manoussakis). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 43-56.
  • Cicero, M. T. (1886). Book V. Virtue Sufficient for Happiness. Tusculan Disputa-tions. (Trans. A. P. Peabody). Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 251-322.
  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Die Technik und die Kehre. Stuttgart: Verlag Günther Neske, 5-36.
  • Heidegger, M. (1993). The Question Concerning Technology. (Trans. W. Lovitt). Basic Writings. New York: Harper Collins, 311-41.
  • Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time. (Trans. J. Stambaugh). Albany: State Uni-versity of New York Press, 83-94.
  • Heidegger, M. (1998). On the Essence and the Concept of Φύσις in Aristotle’s Physics B, I. Pathmarks. (Ed. W. McNeil). The UK: Cambridge University Press, 183-230.
  • Ruin, H. (2010). Ge-stell: Enframing as the Essence of technology. Martin Heidegger Key Concepts. (Ed. B. W. Davis). UK: Acumen Publishing, 183-93.
  • Zimmerman, M. E. (1990). Heidegger’s Confrontation with Modernity Technology, Politics, and Art. The USA: Indiana University Press.
Birincil Dil en
Konular Felsefe
Dergi Bölümü Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yazar: İbrahim Okan Akkın
Kurum: Ardahan University
Ülke: Turkey


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { beytulhikme507791, journal = {Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy}, issn = {}, eissn = {1303-8303}, address = {Mustafa ÇEVİK}, year = {2018}, volume = {8}, pages = {427 - 440}, doi = {10.18491/beytulhikme.507791}, title = {The Residue of Anthropocentrism in Heidegger’s Question after Technic}, key = {cite}, author = {Akkın, İbrahim Okan} }
APA Akkın, İ . (2018). The Residue of Anthropocentrism in Heidegger’s Question after Technic. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 8 (2), 427-440. DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.507791
MLA Akkın, İ . "The Residue of Anthropocentrism in Heidegger’s Question after Technic". Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 8 (2018): 427-440 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/beytulhikme/issue/42387/507791>
Chicago Akkın, İ . "The Residue of Anthropocentrism in Heidegger’s Question after Technic". Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 8 (2018): 427-440
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - The Residue of Anthropocentrism in Heidegger’s Question after Technic AU - İbrahim Okan Akkın Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - doi: 10.18491/beytulhikme.507791 DO - 10.18491/beytulhikme.507791 T2 - Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 427 EP - 440 VL - 8 IS - 2 SN - -1303-8303 M3 - doi: 10.18491/beytulhikme.507791 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.507791 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy The Residue of Anthropocentrism in Heidegger’s Question after Technic %A İbrahim Okan Akkın %T The Residue of Anthropocentrism in Heidegger’s Question after Technic %D 2018 %J Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy %P -1303-8303 %V 8 %N 2 %R doi: 10.18491/beytulhikme.507791 %U 10.18491/beytulhikme.507791
ISNAD Akkın, İbrahim Okan . "The Residue of Anthropocentrism in Heidegger’s Question after Technic". Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 8 / 2 (Aralık 2018): 427-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.507791