Yıl 2018, Cilt 19, Sayı 2, Sayfalar 44 - 56 2018-11-30

İşgücü verimliliğinin üç belirleyicisi vardır. Birincisi insan sermayesi, ikincisi teknolojik değişim, üçüncüsü ise imalat maliyetlerini azaltan ölçek ekonomisidir. Bu çalışmada, ikinci faktör, teknolojik değişim, yenilik test edilecektir. Türkiye'deki yerli patentlerin sayısı, yabancı patent sayısından önemli ölçüde daha düşüktür. Bu nedenle, yenilikçi ürünler azdır. Ancak, patent sayısı arttıkça, yenilikçi satışlar artacak ve bu da işgücü verimliliğini artıracaktır. Yeni inovasyon ve keşifler, yeni ürünlerin ortaya çıkmasına ilham kaynağı olur ve bu da emek verimliliğini artırır. Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de imalat sektöründe verimlilik, yenilik ve araştırma arasındaki bağlantıyı araştırmak için CDM modeli kullanılmıştır. Bu amaçla, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu ve Türk Patent ve Marka Ofisi’nden elde edilen; çalışan başına düşen patent sayısı, Ar-Ge biriminde istihdam edilen personel başına ciro, çalışan başına katma değer kullanılmaktadır. En son yayınlanan veriler 2015'e ait olduğundan, 2009-2015 yıllarına ait veriler kullanımıştır. Panel verileri kullanılarak tahmin edilen modele göre, patent sayısındaki artış yenilikçi satışların artmasına ve yenilikçi satışların artması da işgücü verimliliğinin artmasına neden olmaktadır.

CDM Modeli, Yenilik
  • AGHION, Philippe; Nick BLOOM, Richard BLUNDELL, Rachel, GRIFFITH and Peter HOWITT (2005), “Competition And Innovation: An Inverted –U Relationship”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.120, No.2, 701-728.
  • AMIN, Mohammad (2015), “Competition and Labor Productivity in India’s Retail Stores”, Journal of Asian Economics, 41, 57-68.
  • APERGİS, Nicholas; Claire ECONOMİDOU and Ioannis FILIPPIDIS (2008), “Innovation, Technology Transfer and Labor Productivity Linkages: Evidence From A Panel of Manufacturing Industries”, Review of World Economics, Vol.144, No.3, 491-508.
  • BAUMANN, Julian and Alexander S. KRITIKOS (2016), “The Link Between R&D, Innovation And Productivity: Are Micro Firms Different?”, Research Policy, 45, 1263-1274.
  • BECKER, Wolfgang and Jürgen DIETZ (2004), “R&D Cooperation And Innovation Activities of Firms Evidence for the German Manufacturing Industry”, Research Policy, 33, 209-223.
  • CHUDNOVSKY, Daniel; Andres LÓPEZ and Germán PUPATO (2006), “Innovation And Productivity in Developing Countries: A Study of Argentine Manufacturing Firms’ Behavior (1992-2001)”, Research Policy, 35, 266-288.
  • CREPÓN, Bruno; Emmanuel DUGUET and Jacques MAIRESSE (1998), “Research, Innavation, And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Leve”, Nber Working Paper Series, No.6696.
  • CRESPI, Gustavo and Pluvia ZUNIGA (2012), “Innovation And Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries”, World Development, Vol.40, No.2, 273-290.FU, Xiaolan; Pierre MOHNEN and Giacomo ZANELLO (2018), “Innovation and Productivity in Fomal and Informal Firms in Ghana”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 131, 315-325.
  • GARZIA- POZO; Marchante-Mera ALEJANDRO, J. ANDRES and Juan Antonio CAMPOS-SORIA (2018), “Innovation, Environment, And Productivity in the Spanish Service Sector: An Implementation of a CDM Structural Model”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1049-1057.
  • GLOBERMAN, Steven (2000), Linkages Between Technological Change and Productivity Growth, Paper Number 23, Industry Canada Research Publications Program.
  • GRIFFITH, Rachel; Elena HUERGO, Jacques MAIRESSE and Bettina PETERS (2006), “Innovation And Productivity Across Four European Countries”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol.22, No.4, 483-498.
  • HALL, Bronwyn H.; Francesca LOTTI and Jacques MAIRESSE (2013), “Evidence on the Impact of R&D and ICT Investments on Innovation and Productivity in Italian Firms”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.22, No.3, 300-328.
  • HALL, Bronwyn H. and Vania SENA (2017), “Appropriability Mechanisms, Innovation, and Productivity: Evidence from the UK”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.26, No.1-2, 42-62.
  • HOWELL, Anthony (2017), “Innovation anf Firm Performance in the People’s Republic of China: A Structural Approach with Spillovers”, Asian Development Bank Institute Working Paper Series, No.805.
  • KIJEK, Tomasz and Arkadiusz KIJEK (2018), “Is Innovation the Key to Solving the Productivity Paradox?”, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge (In Press).KORKMAZ, Suna and Oya KORKMAZ (2017), “The Relationship Between Labor Productivity And Economic Growth in OECD Countries”, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol.9, No.5, 71-76.
  • MARADANA, Rana P.; Rudra P. PRADHAN, Saurav DASH, Kunal GAURAV, Manju JAYAKUMAR and Debaleena CHATTERJEE (2017), “Does Innovation Promote Economic Growth? Evidence from European Countries”, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, (6):1, 1-23.
  • MASSO, Jaan and Priit VAHTER (2008), “Technological Innovation and Productivity in late-transition Estonia: Econometric Evidence from Innovation Surveys”, The European Journal of Development Research, Vol.20, No.2, 240-261.
  • MOHNEN, Pierre and Bronwyn HALL (2013), “Innovation And Productivity: An Update”, Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 47-65.
  • PETERS, Bettina; Rebecca RILEY, Iulia SIEDSCHLAG, Priit VAHTER and John MCQUINN (2018), “Internationalisation, Innovation and Prductivity in Services: Evidence From Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom”, Review of World Economics, 154, 585-615.
  • PREENEN, Paul TY; Robert VERGEER, Karolus KRAAN and Steven DHONDT (2017), “Labour Productivity and Innovation Performance: The Importance of Internal Labour Flexibility Practices”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol.38 (2), 271-293. SCHERER, F. M. (1965), “Firm Size, Market Structure, Oppurtunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions”, The American Economic Review, Vol.55, No.5, 1097-1125.
  • SCHERER, F. M. (1967), “Market Structure and the Employment of Scientists and Engineers”, The American Economic Review, Vol.57, No.3, 524-531.
  • SCHMOOKLER, Jacob and Oswald BROWNLEE (1962), “Determinants of Inventive Activity”, The American Economic Review, Vol.52, No.2, 165-176.
  • ULKU, Hulya (2004), “R&D, Innovation, and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis”, IMF Working Paper, WP/04/185.
  • YAMADA, Tetsuji; Tadashi YAMADA and Guoen LIU (1991), “Labor Productivity and Market Competition in Japan”, NBER Working Paper, No.3800.
Birincil Dil en
Konular Sosyal
Dergi Bölümü Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yazar: Zeynep Karaca (Sorumlu Yazar)
Ülke: Turkey


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { cumuiibf457366, journal = {Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi}, issn = {}, eissn = {1303-1279}, address = {Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi}, year = {2018}, volume = {19}, pages = {44 - 56}, doi = {}, title = {RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS AT THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TURKEY}, key = {cite}, author = {Karaca, Zeynep} }
APA Karaca, Z . (2018). RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS AT THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TURKEY. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19 (2), 44-56. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/cumuiibf/issue/40744/457366
MLA Karaca, Z . "RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS AT THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TURKEY". Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 19 (2018): 44-56 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/cumuiibf/issue/40744/457366>
Chicago Karaca, Z . "RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS AT THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TURKEY". Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 19 (2018): 44-56
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS AT THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TURKEY AU - Zeynep Karaca Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - DO - T2 - Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 44 EP - 56 VL - 19 IS - 2 SN - -1303-1279 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS AT THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TURKEY %A Zeynep Karaca %T RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS AT THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TURKEY %D 2018 %J Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi %P -1303-1279 %V 19 %N 2 %R %U
ISNAD Karaca, Zeynep . "RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS AT THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TURKEY". Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 19 / 2 (Kasım 2018): 44-56.