Cilt 13, Sayı 48, Sayfalar 159 - 175 2014-09-10

POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES IN TURKEY: A MONETARY APPROACH
TÜRKİYE’DE POLİTİK İŞ ÇEVRİMLERİ: PARASAL BİR YAKLAŞIM

Mesut KARAKA [1]

237 229

Politics and economics are two dependent areas that lead to political business cycles. Countries with different development levels encounter political business cycles differently. The existence of political business cycles is mostly researched on the basis of fiscal variables. In this paper, we will be dealing with the existence of political business cycles with respect to monetary variables. Our research utilizes a simple but explanatory time series model. The empirical results show the existence of the opportunistic political business cycles in Turkish economy. Keywords: Political business cycles; Time series analysis; Turkish political economy
Politika ve ekonomi politik iş çevrimlerine neden olan iki bağımlı alandır. Değişik gelişmişlik düzeyine sahip ülkeler politik iş çevrimleriyle farklı bir şekilde karşı karşıya gelmektedir. Politik iş çevrimlerin varlığı daha çok mali değişkenler ile araştırılmıştır. Bu makalede, politik iş çevrimlerinin varlığı parasal değişkenler göz önüne alınarak ele alınmaktadır. Araştırmamız basit ama açıklayıcı bir zaman serisi modeli kullanmaktadır. Ampirik sonuçlar, Türkiye'de fırsatçı politik iş çevrimlerinin varlığını göstermektedir.
  • Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-party System as a Repeated Game. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 651-678.
  • Alesina, A. (1988). Credibility and Policy convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters. American Economic Review, 78, 796-805.
  • Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G. (1992). Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Alesina, A., & Roubini, N. (1992). Political cycles in OECD Economies. Review of Economic Studies, 59, 663-688.
  • Asutay, M. (2004). Searching for Opportunistic Political Business Cycles in Turkey. Paper presented in European Public Choice Society.
  • Berument, H., & Heckelman, J. C. (1998). Political Business Cycles and Endogenous Elections. Southern Economic Journal, 64(4), 987-1000.
  • Drazen, A. (2000). Political Economy in Macroeconomics. Princeton, Nj:Princeton University Press.
  • Drazen, A. (2000). The Political Business Cycle after 25 Years. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 15, 75-117.
  • EVDS Central Bank of Turkey. Retrieved from http://evds.tcmb.gov.tr/ Fair, R. (1978). The Effects of Economic Events on Votes for President. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 159-172.
  • Grier, K. (1989). On the Existence of a Political Monetary Cycle. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 376-389.
  • Haynes, S., & Stone, J. (1989). Political Models of the Business Cycle Should be Reviewed. Economic Inquiry, 28, 442-465.
  • Hibbs, D. (1977). Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review, 71, 1467-1487.
  • Johnston, J., & Dinardo, J. (1997). Econometric Methods. Irwin: McGraw-Hill.
  • Keech, W., & Pak, K. (1989). Electoral Cycles and Budgetary Growth in Veterans’ Benefit Programs. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 901-911.
  • Kramer, G. (1971). Short-term Fluctuations in US Voting Behavior, 1896-1964. American Political Science Review, 65, 131-143.
  • Kuzu, Y. (2003). Political Business Cycle in the Turkish Economy: 1977-2001. METU Conference in Economics VII September 6-9, 2003, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Nordhaus, W. (1975). The Political Business Cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42, 1691
  • Rogoff, K., & Sibert, A. (1988). Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles. Review of Economic Studies, 55, 1-16.
  • Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles. American Economic Review, 80, 21Sezgin, Ş. (2007). Türkiye’de Politik Konjonktürel Dalgalanmalar: 1950-2003 Dönemi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 62(2), 136-154.
  • Tufte, E. (1975). Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review, 69, 812-826.
  • Tufte, E. (1978). Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, Nj:Princeton University Press. Tutar, İ., & Tansel, A. (2000). Political Business Cycles, Institutional Structure and Budget Deficits in Turkey. Paper presented in Metu Conference in Economics.
  • Türkiye Seçimleri. Retrieved from http://www.belgenet.net/ Williams, J. (1990). The political Manipulation of Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review, 84, 767-795.
Birincil Dil tr
Konular
Dergi Bölümü Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yazar: Mesut KARAKA
E-posta:

Bibtex @ { esosder82854, journal = {Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi}, issn = {1304-0278}, address = {Özel Akademi}, year = {2014}, volume = {13}, pages = {159 - 175}, doi = {10.17755/esosder.07188}, title = {POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES IN TURKEY: A MONETARY APPROACH}, language = {en}, key = {cite}, author = {KARAKA, Mesut} } @ { esosder82854, journal = {Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi}, issn = {1304-0278}, address = {Özel Akademi}, year = {2014}, volume = {13}, pages = {159 - 175}, doi = {10.17755/esosder.07188}, title = {TÜRKİYE’DE POLİTİK İŞ ÇEVRİMLERİ: PARASAL BİR YAKLAŞIM}, language = {tr}, key = {cite}, author = {KARAKA, Mesut} }
APA KARAKA, M . (2014). POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES IN TURKEY: A MONETARY APPROACH. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13 (48), 159-175. DOI: 10.17755/esosder.07188
MLA KARAKA, M . "POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES IN TURKEY: A MONETARY APPROACH". Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13 (2014): 159-175 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/esosder/issue/6162/82854>
Chicago KARAKA, M . "POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES IN TURKEY: A MONETARY APPROACH". Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13 (2014): 159-175
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - TÜRKİYE’DE POLİTİK İŞ ÇEVRİMLERİ: PARASAL BİR YAKLAŞIM AU - Mesut KARAKA Y1 - 2014 PY - 2014 N1 - doi: 10.17755/esosder.07188 DO - 10.17755/esosder.07188 T2 - Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 159 EP - 175 VL - 13 IS - 48 SN - 1304-0278- M3 - doi: 10.17755/esosder.07188 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.17755/esosder.07188 Y2 - 2017 ER -
EndNote %0 Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi TÜRKİYE’DE POLİTİK İŞ ÇEVRİMLERİ: PARASAL BİR YAKLAŞIM %A Mesut KARAKA %T TÜRKİYE’DE POLİTİK İŞ ÇEVRİMLERİ: PARASAL BİR YAKLAŞIM %D 2014 %J Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi %P 1304-0278- %V 13 %N 48 %R doi: 10.17755/esosder.07188 %U 10.17755/esosder.07188