Yıl 2018, Cilt 2, Sayı 3, Sayfalar 92 - 114 2018-09-30

Feminist Economics and Its Critics from a Historical Perspective

Hülya DERYA [1]

29 68

This study moves from a historical perspective; the criticism and emergence of feminist economics, and the story of free and low-wage working women, termed as "other economics," is pushed into an edge in capitalism, and the production and reproduction of the material conditions of life are shaped in the context of more exploitative-production-dominance relations. The first women's movement that emerged in the 1400s based on different schools turned day by day into multi-voice feminist schools. Feminist economists both in classical and neoclassical theories of economics; criticize the disappearance of women. Although Marx and Keynes criticized capitalism hard, they were male-centered in crisis models. Thus, in Marks and Keynes thought models, the differences between economics and "other economics" relations cannot be adequately analyzed.
Marks, Keynes, Feminist Economics, Neoclassical, Other Economics
  • Arbeitsgruppe Alternative Wirtschaftspolitik,(2006).Memorandum 2006. Mehr Beschäftigung braucht eine andere Verteilung, Köln.
  • Bakker, Isabella, (1994). The Strategic Silence. Gender and Economic Policy, London.
  • Barker, Drucilla/Kuiper, Edith, (2003). Toward a Feminist Philosophy of Economics, New York.
  • Benería, Lourdes, (2003). Gender, Development and Globalisation. Economics as if all people mattered. New York.
  • Bergmann, B. R,(1996). “What is Feminist Economics all about?” Challenge, s.4-8, January-February.
  • Berik, Günseli (1997): The Need for Crossing the Method Boundaries in Economics Research, in: Feminist Economics 3 (2): 121-125.
  • BFS, Bundesamt für Statistik, Statistisches Lexikon online (Ende Juni 2011): Arbeitsproduktivität nach Branchen zu laufenden Preisen NOGA 60 (T4.7.4.3) und NOGA 17 (T4.7.4.2)
  • Bodkin, R. G. (1999). “Women‟s Agency in Classıcal Economıc Thought: Adam Smith, Harriet Taylor Mill, and J. S. Mıll,” Feminist Economics, 5(1), s.45-60.
  • Credit Suisse, (2010). Swiss Issues Branchen – Die Struktur der Schweizer Wirtschaft 1998– 2020. Hg. Economic Research der CS.
  • Donath, Susan, (2000). The Other Economy – A suggestion for a Distinctively Feminist Economics. In: Feminist Economics, 6. Jahrgang, 1. Halbjahr, S. 115–125.
  • Elson, Diane, (2002). Geschlechtergerechtigkeit durch Gender-Budgeting? Einige Aspekte und Beispiele aus der Praxis von Gender-Responsive-Budget-Initiativen
  • Federicih, Silvia, (2004). Caliban and the With – Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. Autonomedia, Brooklyn, New York.
  • Ferber, Marianne/Nelson, Julie, (1993). Beyond Economic Man. Feminist Theory and Economics, Chicago.
  • Frey, Regina, (2003). Gender im Mainstreaming. Geschlechtertheorie und -praxis im internationalen Diskurs.
  • Habermann, Friederike, (2010). Hegemonie, Identität und der homo oeconomicus. Oder: Warum feministische Ökonomie nicht ausreicht
  • Haug, Frigga, (2007). Rosa Luxemburg und die Kunst der Politik, Hamburg.
  • Hewitson, Gillian, (1999). Feminist Economics. Interrogating the Masculinity of Rational Economic Man, Cheltenham.
  • Hoppe, Hella, (2002). Feministische Ökonomik. Gender in Wirtschaftstheorien und ihren Methoden, Berlin.
  • Klamer, Arjo/Leonard, Thomas C. (1994). So what’s an economic metaphor?, in: Philip Mirowski (Ed.) Natural Images in Economics, Cambridge.
  • Kuiper, Edith, (2008). Feminism in/and Economics.
  • Kurz-Scherf Ingrid, (2007). Soziabilität – auf der Suche nach neuen Leitbildern der Arbeits- und Geschlechterpolitik.
  • Leonore Davidoff, (1995). Worlds Between – Historical Perspectives on Gender & Class. Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • Longino,Helen E. (1993).Economics for Whom? Beyond Economic Man(der.M.A.Ferber;J.A.Nelson) içinde,Chicago,University of Chigago. Press,s.158-168.
  • Madörin,Mascha,(2010a):Care-Ökonomie–eineHerausforderung für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften. In: Christine Bauhardt und Gülay Çaglar(Hg.): Gender and Economics – Feministische Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden, S. 81-104.
  • Maier, Friederike, (1993). Homo Oeconomicus – Zur geschlechtsspezifischen Konstruktion der Wirtschaftswissenschaften.
  • Michalitsch, Gabriele/Schlager, Christa, (2006). Feministische Ökonomik in Österreich. Eine Landvermessung verzögerten Widerspruchs.
  • Mies, Maria, (2009). Hausfrauisierung, Globalisierung, Subsistenzperspektive. In: Marcel van der Linden und Karl-Heinz Roth (Hg.): Über Marx hinaus. Assoziation A., Berlin/Hamburg, S. 257-289.
  • Mill, John Stuart/Taylor Mill, Harriet, (1869). Die Hörigkeit der Frau. Frankfurt/Main.
  • Nelson, J. A, (1995).“Feminism and Economics,” The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(2), s.131- 148, Spring.
  • Power, Marilyn, (2004). Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics.
  • Pujol, Michèle, (1992). Feminism and Anti-Feminism in Early Economic Thought, Aldershot.
  • Robeyns, Ingrid, (2000): Is there feminist economic methodology?
  • Schultheiss, Jana, (2008). Frauenerwerbstätigkeit heute. Emanzipatorische, neoliberale und konservative Modell.
  • Serdaroğlu, Ufuk, Feminist İktisat’ın Bakışı, Sarmal Yayınevi, İstanbul, 128s
  • Serdaroğlu,Ufuk(1997). Kişisel olan sadece politik değil, aynı zamanda iktisadidir. Feminist İktisat, Mülkiyeliler Birliği Dergisi, Mart 1997,Cilt 21,197,s3-10.
  • Singer, Mona,(2004).Feministische Wissenschaftskritik und Epistemologie: Voraussetzungen, Positionen, Perspektiven.
  • Staveren, Irene (1997): Focus Groups: Contributing to a Gender-Aware Methodology.
  • Strassmann, Diana, (1997). Editorial: Expanding the Methodological Boundaries of Economics.
  • Strober, M. H,(1994). “Rethinking Economics Through a Feminist Lens,” Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic, The American Economic Review, 84(2).
  • Sturm, Gabriele, (1994), Wie forschen Frauen? Überlegungen zur Entscheidung für qualitatives oder quantifizierendes Vorgehen.
  • Thiessen, Barbara,(2004).Re-Formulierung des Privaten. Professionalisierung personenbezogener, haushaltsnaher Dienstleistungsarbeit, Wiesbaden.
Birincil Dil en
Konular Sosyal
Dergi Bölümü Makaleler
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0002-1953-2459
Yazar: Hülya DERYA
Kurum: KİLİS 7 ARALIK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Ülke: Turkey


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { fsecon458625, journal = {Fiscaoeconomia}, issn = {}, eissn = {2564-7504}, address = {Ahmet Arif EREN}, year = {2018}, volume = {2}, pages = {92 - 114}, doi = {10.25295/fsecon.2018.03.004}, title = {Feminist Economics and Its Critics from a Historical Perspective}, key = {cite}, author = {DERYA, Hülya} }
APA DERYA, H . (2018). Feminist Economics and Its Critics from a Historical Perspective. Fiscaoeconomia, 2 (3), 92-114. DOI: 10.25295/fsecon.2018.03.004
MLA DERYA, H . "Feminist Economics and Its Critics from a Historical Perspective". Fiscaoeconomia 2 (2018): 92-114 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/fsecon/issue/39490/458625>
Chicago DERYA, H . "Feminist Economics and Its Critics from a Historical Perspective". Fiscaoeconomia 2 (2018): 92-114
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Feminist Economics and Its Critics from a Historical Perspective AU - Hülya DERYA Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - doi: 10.25295/fsecon.2018.03.004 DO - 10.25295/fsecon.2018.03.004 T2 - Fiscaoeconomia JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 92 EP - 114 VL - 2 IS - 3 SN - -2564-7504 M3 - doi: 10.25295/fsecon.2018.03.004 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2018.03.004 Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Fiscaoeconomia Feminist Economics and Its Critics from a Historical Perspective %A Hülya DERYA %T Feminist Economics and Its Critics from a Historical Perspective %D 2018 %J Fiscaoeconomia %P -2564-7504 %V 2 %N 3 %R doi: 10.25295/fsecon.2018.03.004 %U 10.25295/fsecon.2018.03.004
ISNAD DERYA, Hülya . "Feminist Economics and Its Critics from a Historical Perspective". Fiscaoeconomia 2 / 3 (Eylül 2018): 92-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2018.03.004