Yıl 2018, Cilt 5, Sayı 4, Sayfalar 631 - 644 2018-12-16

Turkish Adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale IV

Turgut Türkdoğan [1] , Erdinç Duru [2] , Murat Balkıs [3]

71 80

The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale IV (FACES IV) Questionnaire Package, and also to achieve a valid and reliable assessment tool for the further investigations of the Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems in Turkish culture. A total of 1613 (65.4% female, 34.6% male) university students agreed to participate in the study. The construct validity of the FACES IV was examined with confirmatory factor analysis. Also, the convergent validity, criterion-related validity, internal reliability, and test-retest reliability analyses were examined within the scope of validity and reliability studies. Findings indicate that Turkish form of FACES IV can be used as a valid and reliable scale with sufficient psychometric properties to evaluate the family cohesion, family adaptability, family communication, family satisfaction, and the family functioning as a whole in Turkish culture. 

Circumplex model, Family adaptability, Family cohesion, Family functioning, Family satisfac-tion
  • Baiocco, R., Cacioppo, M., Laghi, F., & Tafa, M. (2013). Factorial and construct validity of FACES IV among Italian adolescents. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 22, 962-970.
  • Barber, B. K., & Buehler, C. (1996). Family cohesion and enmeshment: Different constructs, different effects. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 433-441.
  • Beavers, R., & Hampson, B. (1990). Successful families: Assessment and intervention. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Beavers, R., & Hampson, B. (2000). The Beavers Systems Model of family functioning. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 128-143.
  • Costa-Ball, D., Gonzalez-Tornaria, M., delArca, D., Masjuan, N., & Olson, D. H. (2013). Psychometrıc propertıes of FACES IV: Validity study in Uruguayan population. [Abstract]. Ciencias Psicologicas, 7(2), 119-132.
  • Doherty, W. J., & Hovander, D. (1990). Why don’t family measures of cohesion and control behave the way they’re supposed to? American Journal of Family Therapy, 18, 5-18.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Harold, R. D. (1996). Family involvement in children’s and adolescents’ schooling. In A. Booth & J. F. Dunn (Eds.), Family school links: How do they affect educational outcomes? (pp. 3-34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Eker, D. Arkar, H., & Yaldız, H. (2001). Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of revised form of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 12(1), 17-25.
  • Epstein, N., Baldwin, L., & Bishop, D. (1983). The McMaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9(2), 171-180.
  • Epstein, N., Baldwin, L., & Bishop, D. (1983). The McMaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9(2), 171-180.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Gladding, S. T. (2011). Family therapy: History, theory and practice. (5th ed). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  • Gorall, T. M., Tiesel, J., & Olson, D. H. (2006). FACES IV: Development and validation. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.
  • Gulerce, A. (2007). The transformational family model and the psychological patterns of families in Turkey. Istanbul: Bogazici University Library Cataloguing.
  • Hamilton, E., & Carr, A. (2016). Systematic review of self-report family assessment measures. Family Process, 55(1), 16-30.
  • Klein, K., & Forehand, R. (2000). Family processes as resources for African-American children exposed to a constellation of sociodemographic risk factors. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29(1), 53-65.
  • Kouneski, E. (2002). Circumplex model and FACES: Review of literature. Twin Cities, MN: University of Minnesota.
  • Koutra, K., Triliva, S., Roumeliotaki, T., Lionis, C., & Vgontzas, A. N. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Greek version of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales IV package (FACES IV Package). Journal of Family Issues, 34(12), 1647-1672.
  • Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. doi: 10.1177/001316447003000308
  • Loriedo, C., Di Nuovo, S. F., & Visani, E. (2013). FACES-IV reliability and validity in an adult Italian sample. Retrieved from http://www.buildingrelationships.com/facesiv_studies/italy_facesiv_2013.pdf
  • Marsac, M. L., & Alderfer, M. A. (2011). Psychometric properties of the FACES-IV in a pediatric oncology population. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36(5), 528-538.
  • Mikolajczak, M., Raes, M. E., Avalosse, H., & Roskam, I. (2018). Exhausted parents: Sociodemographic, child-related, parent-related, parenting and family-functioning correlates of parental burnout. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(2), 602-614.
  • Mirnics, Z., Vargha, A., Toth, M., & Bagdy, E. (2010). Cross-cultural applicability of FACES IV. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 21(1), 17-33.
  • Moos, R., & Moos, B. (2009). Family environment scale manual (4th ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
  • Okman-Fisek, G. (1990). Family interconnectedness. Graduate seminar. Bogazici University, Department of Educational Sciences, Istanbul.
  • Olson D. H., & Gorall D. M. (2006). FACES IV and the circumplex model. Retrieved from https://www.societyofpediatricpsychology.org/sites/default/files/files/3_innovations.pdf
  • Olson D. H., Gorall D. M., Tiesel J. W. (2007). FACES IV Manual. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.
  • Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144-167.
  • Olson, D. H. (2011). FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7(1), 64-80.
  • Olson, D. H., McCubbin, H. I., Barnes, H., Larsen, A., Muxen, M., & Wilson, M. (1989). Families: What makes them work (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1983). Circumplex model of martial and family systems: VI. Theoretical update. Family Process, 22, 69-83.
  • Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1989). Circumplex Model: Systemic assessment and treatment of families. New York, NY: Haworth Press.
  • Olson, D.H., & Gorall, D. M. (2003). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. In F. Walsh (Ed.) Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (3rd ed., pp. 514-548). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Olson, D.H., Sprenkle, D.H., & Russell, C. S. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family system: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process, 18(1), 3-28.
  • Pereira, M. G., & Teixeira, R. J. (2013). Portuguese validation of FACES-IV in adult children caregivers facing parental cancer. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 35, 478-490.
  • Pirutinsky, S., & Kor, A. (2013). Relevance of the circumplex model to family functioning among Orthodox Jews in Israel. The New School Psychology Bulletin, 10(2), 25-38.
  • Rivero, N., Martinez-Pampliega, A., & Olson, D. H. (2010). Spanish adaptation of the FACES IV questionnaire: Psychometric characteristics. The Family Journal, 18(3), 288-296.
  • Sebokova, G., Jurisova, E., Popelkova, M., Uhlarikova, J., & Zatkova, M. (2016). Factorial validity and reliability of the Slovak version of the F ACES IV in adolescents. [Abstract]. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 60(3), 278-289.
  • Skinner, H., Steinhauer, P., & Sitarenios, G. (2000). Family assessment measure (FAM) and process model of family functioning. Journal of Family Functioning, 22, 190-210.
  • Stratton, P., Bland, J., Janes, E., & Lask, J. (2010). Developing an indicator of family function and a practicable outcome measure for systemic family and couple therapy: The SCORE. Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 232-258.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Tolan, P., Gorman-Smith, D., Huesmann, R., & Zelli, A. (1997). Assessment of family relationship characteristics: A measure to explain risk for antisocial behaviour and depression among urban youth. Psychological Assessment, 9(3), 212-223.
  • Trent, K., & South, S. J. (1992). Sociodemographic status, parental background, childhood family structure, and attitudes toward family formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54(2), 427-439.
  • Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41.
Birincil Dil en
Konular Eğitim Bilimleri
Yayımlanma Tarihi December
Dergi Bölümü Makaleler
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0001-5440-341X
Yazar: Turgut Türkdoğan (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
Ülke: Turkey


Yazar: Erdinç Duru
Kurum: Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey

Yazar: Murat Balkıs
Kurum: Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { ijate409110, journal = {International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education}, issn = {}, eissn = {2148-7456}, address = {İzzet KARA}, year = {2018}, volume = {5}, pages = {631 - 644}, doi = {10.21449/ijate.409110}, title = {Turkish Adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale IV}, key = {cite}, author = {Türkdoğan, Turgut and Balkıs, Murat and Duru, Erdinç} }
APA Türkdoğan, T , Duru, E , Balkıs, M . (2018). Turkish Adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale IV. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5 (4), 631-644. DOI: 10.21449/ijate.409110
MLA Türkdoğan, T , Duru, E , Balkıs, M . "Turkish Adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale IV". International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 5 (2018): 631-644 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/ijate/issue/38884/409110>
Chicago Türkdoğan, T , Duru, E , Balkıs, M . "Turkish Adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale IV". International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 5 (2018): 631-644
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Turkish Adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale IV AU - Turgut Türkdoğan , Erdinç Duru , Murat Balkıs Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - doi: 10.21449/ijate.409110 DO - 10.21449/ijate.409110 T2 - International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 631 EP - 644 VL - 5 IS - 4 SN - -2148-7456 M3 - doi: 10.21449/ijate.409110 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.21449/ijate.409110 Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education Turkish Adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale IV %A Turgut Türkdoğan , Erdinç Duru , Murat Balkıs %T Turkish Adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale IV %D 2018 %J International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education %P -2148-7456 %V 5 %N 4 %R doi: 10.21449/ijate.409110 %U 10.21449/ijate.409110
ISNAD Türkdoğan, Turgut , Duru, Erdinç , Balkıs, Murat . "Turkish Adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale IV". International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 5 / 4 (Aralık 2018): 631-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.21449/ijate.409110