Yıl 2019, Cilt 7, Sayı 1, Sayfalar 1 - 19 2019-01-01

Investigation of an Alternatively Certified New High School Chemistry Teacher’s Assessment Literacy

Kemal Izci [1] , Marcelle A. Siegel [2]

47 102

Assessing student learning to adapt instruction to support learning is an important skill all teachers need to develop. However, it is not an easy task for teachers and even more difficult for new teachers. The current study aims to explore an alternatively certified new chemistry teacher’s understanding and practices of classroom assessment to help educators and researchers to support teachers’ assessment literacies. This study used holistic case study design to explore the teacher’s assessment literacy. Pre/reflective interviews, observations, classroom artifacts, including assessment tasks and a survey, were used as data sources. The results suggest that, in theory, the teacher’s understanding of assessment aligned with current view of assessment as she mostly valued formative function of assessment while, in practice, the teacher faced difficulties to practice assessment as she preferred and did not select and use appropriate assessment tasks to accomplish her aims, such as supporting conceptual learning.

Teacher education, Alternative certification, Assessment literacy
  • Abell, S. K., & Siegel,M. A. (2011). Assessment literacy: What science teachers need to know and be able to do? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 205–221). The Netherlands: Springer. Akerson, V., Carter, I., Park Rogers, M., Pongsanon, K. (2018). A video-based measure of preservice teachers’ abilities to predict elementary students’ scientific reasoning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6 (1), 79-92. Ateh, C. M. (2015). Science teachers' elicitation practices: insights for formative assessment. Educational Assessment, 20(2), 112-131. Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45(1), 83-93. Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. M., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
  • Baptiste, I. (2001). Qualitative data analysis: Common phases, strategic differences. Retrieved January 29, 2018, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqstexte/3-01/3-01baptiste-e.htm Barendsen, E. & Henze, I. (2017). Relating teacher PCK and teacher practice using classroom observation. Res Sci Educ, doi.10.1007/s11165-017-9637-z Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5 – 25 Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Eds.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81-100). London: Sage. Box, C., Skoog, G., & Dabbs, J. M. (2015). A case study of teacher personal practice assessment theories and complexities of implementing formative assessment. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 956–983. Brown, G. T. L. (2008). Conceptions of assessment: Understanding what assessment means to teachers and students. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chen, B., & Wei, B. (2015). Examining chemistry teachers’ use of curriculum materials: In view of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 260–272. Cisterna, D. & Gotwals, A. (2018) Enactment of ongoing formative assessment: Challenges and opportunities for professional development and practice, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(3), 200-222, DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2018.1432227 Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109-1136. Fletcher, A. & Shaw G. (2012). How does student-directed assessment affect learning? Using assessment as a learning process. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6, 245-263. Gottheiner, D. G., & Siegel, M. A. (2012). Experienced middle school science teachers’ assessment literacy: Investigating knowledge of students’ conceptions in genetics and ways to shape instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 531–557. Gotwals, A. W., & Birmingham, D. (2016). Eliciting, identifying, interpreting, and responding to students’ ideas: Teacher candidates’ growth in formative assessment practices. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 365–388. Harshman J. and Yezierski E. (2017). Assessment data-driven inquiry: A review of how to use assessment results to inform chemistry teaching, Science Educator, 25 (2), p. 97-107. Harshman, J. and Yezierski, E. (2016). Characterizing high school chemistry teachers’ use of assessment data via latent class analysis, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 17(2), 296–308. Harshman, J., & Yezierski, E. (2015). Guiding teaching with assessments: High school chemistry teachers’ use of data-driven inquiry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 16(1), 93-103. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112. Haug, B. S., & Ødegaard, M. (2015). Formative assessment and teachers' sensitivity to student responses. International Journal of Science Education, 37(4), 629-654. Herman, J., Osmundson, E., Dai, Y., Ringstaff, C., & Timms, M. (2015). Investigating the dynamics of formative assessment: relationships between teacher knowledge, assessment practice and learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 344-367. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2015.1006521 Izci, K. (2013). Investigating high school chemistry teachers’ perceptions, knowledge and practices of classroom assessment. (Unpublished PhD Thesis), Columbia: University of Missouri-Columbia Lewis, E. & Lu, J. (2017). A Case of fragmented high school earth and space science education in the great plains: Tracing teacher certification policy to students' access. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(3), pp. 304-321 Liu, O., Lee, H., Hofstetter, C., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Assessing knowledge integration in science: Construct, measures, and evidence. Educational Assessment, 13(1), 23 Looney, A., Cumming, J., Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2017). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: Teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090 Lyon, E. G. (2011). Beliefs, practices, and reflection: Exploring a science teacher’s classroom assessment through the assessment triangle model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(5), 417-435. DOI: 10.1007/1097201192414 Lyon, E. G. (2013). What about language while equitably assessing science? Case studies of preservice teachers’ evolving expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education,32, 1-11. Mertler, C. A., & Campbell, C. (2005 April). Measuring teachers’ knowledge and application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the “Assessment Literacy Inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, QC. National Research Council. (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2014). Designing assessment for next generation science standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Nixon, R. S., Hill, K. M. & Luft, J. A. (2017) Secondary science teachers’ subject matter knowledge development across the first 5 years, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(7), 574-589, DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2017.1388086 Kang, H., Thompson, J. & Windschitl, M. (2014). Creating opportunities for students to show what they know: The role of scaffolding in assessment tasks. Science Education, 98(4), 674–704. Doi.10.1002/sce.21123 Kang, H. & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Supporting preservice science teachers’ ability to attend and respond to student thinking by design. Science Education, 99(5), 863–895. Knight, S. L., & Duschl, R. A. (2015). Current trends in the framing of teacher qualities. In G. K. LeTendre & A. W. Wiseman (Eds.), Promoting and sustaining a quality teacher workforce: International perspectives on education and society (pp. 443–465). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. Olson, J. Tippett, D., Milford, M., Ohana, C. & Clough P. (2015) Science teacher preparation in a North American context. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(1), 7-28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. 2009. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/43023606.pdf Otero, V. K. (2006). Moving beyond the “get it or don’t” conception of formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 247–255. doi:10.1177/0022487105285963 Quellmalz, E. S., Timms, M. J., Silberglitt, M. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2012). Science assessments for all: Integrating science simulations into balanced state science assessment systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 363-393. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Redding, C., Smith, T. M. (2016). Easy in, easy out: Are alternatively certified teachers turning over at increased rates? American Educational Research Journal, 53, 1086-1125. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. &Furtak E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57-77. Sach, E. (2015). An exploration of teachers' narratives: what are the facilitators and constraints which promote or inhibit ‘good’ formative assessment practices in schools? International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 43(1), 322-335. doi.10.1080/ 03004279.2013.813956 Sandlin B., Harshman J. and Yezierski E. (2015). Formative assessment in high school chemistry teaching: investigating the alignment of teachers' goals with their items. J. Chem. Educ., 92(10), 1619–1625. Serin, G. (2015). Alternative assessment practices of a classroom teacher: Alignment with reform-based science curriculum. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(2), 277–297. Shank, G. (2006). Six alternatives to mixed methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(1), 346–356. doi: 10.1177/1478088706070842 Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29, 4-14. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. Shuls, J. V., & Trivitt, J. R. (2015). Teacher effectiveness: an analysis of licensure screens. Educational Policy, 29(4), 645–675. Siegel, M. A., & Wissehr, C. (2011). Preparing for the plunge: Preservice teachers assessment literacy. (2011). Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 371–391. doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9231-6 Stiggins, R. J. (2008). An introduction to student-involved assessment FOR learning. New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. Vogelzang, J. & Admiraal, W. F. (2017). Classroom action research on formative assessment in a context-based chemistry course, Educational Action Research, 25(1),155-166, DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2016.1177564 Whitford, D., Zhang D. & Katsiyannis, A. (2018). Traditional vs. Alternative Teacher Preparation Programs: A Meta-Analysis. J Child Fam Stud, 27 (1), 671–685. Xu, Y. & Brown, G.T. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58(1), 149-162. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed. Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., et al. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 335–359
Birincil Dil en
Konular Sosyal
Dergi Bölümü Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yazar: Kemal Izci

Yazar: Marcelle A. Siegel

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { ijemst473605, journal = {International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology}, issn = {}, eissn = {2147-611X}, address = {ISRES Publishing}, year = {2019}, volume = {7}, pages = {1 - 19}, doi = {10.18404/ijemst.473605}, title = {Investigation of an Alternatively Certified New High School Chemistry Teacher’s Assessment Literacy}, key = {cite}, author = {Izci, Kemal and Siegel, Marcelle A.} }
APA Izci, K , Siegel, M . (2019). Investigation of an Alternatively Certified New High School Chemistry Teacher’s Assessment Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 7 (1), 1-19. DOI: 10.18404/ijemst.473605
MLA Izci, K , Siegel, M . "Investigation of an Alternatively Certified New High School Chemistry Teacher’s Assessment Literacy". International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology 7 (2019): 1-19 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/ijemst/issue/39894/473605>
Chicago Izci, K , Siegel, M . "Investigation of an Alternatively Certified New High School Chemistry Teacher’s Assessment Literacy". International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology 7 (2019): 1-19
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Investigation of an Alternatively Certified New High School Chemistry Teacher’s Assessment Literacy AU - Kemal Izci , Marcelle A. Siegel Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - doi: 10.18404/ijemst.473605 DO - 10.18404/ijemst.473605 T2 - International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 1 EP - 19 VL - 7 IS - 1 SN - -2147-611X M3 - doi: 10.18404/ijemst.473605 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.473605 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology Investigation of an Alternatively Certified New High School Chemistry Teacher’s Assessment Literacy %A Kemal Izci , Marcelle A. Siegel %T Investigation of an Alternatively Certified New High School Chemistry Teacher’s Assessment Literacy %D 2019 %J International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology %P -2147-611X %V 7 %N 1 %R doi: 10.18404/ijemst.473605 %U 10.18404/ijemst.473605
ISNAD Izci, Kemal , Siegel, Marcelle A. . "Investigation of an Alternatively Certified New High School Chemistry Teacher’s Assessment Literacy". International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology 7 / 1 (Ocak 2019): 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.473605