Yıl 2018, Cilt 26, Sayı 5, Sayfalar 1785 - 1792 2018-09-15

İngilizceyi Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğrenen Türk Öğrencilerin Etik Olmayan Davranışları Üzerine Bir Araştırma
An investigation on Turkish EFL Majoring Students’ Unethical Behaviors

Muzaffer Barın [1] , Turgay Han [2] , Nilüfer Aybirdi [3]

38 47

Birçok bilimsel çalışma aşırmacılık konusunu farklı eğitim bağlamlarında araştırmıştır. Ancak, çok az sayıda araştırma  yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğrenen Türk öğrencilerin etik anlayışını cinsiyet ve izlenim yönetimi perspektiflerinden araştırmıştır. Verilerin toplanması için akademik aldatma ölçeği, izlenim yönetimi ölçeği ve kişisel nitelikler anketi kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırma, İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenen Türk öğrencilerinin akademik davranışlara, izlenim yönetimine ve psikolojik cinsiyete yönelik tutumlarını araştırmaktadır. Veriler, Türkiye’deki üç devlet üniversitesinden yabancı dil olarak İngilizce bölümlerine devam eden 285 öğrenciden toplanmıştır. Sonuçlar, öğrencelerin  orta düzeyde aldatma davranışı sergilediği, farklı düzeylerde aldatmaya yönelik inançlarının olduğunu ve cinsiyete göre anlamlı bir farklılığı olmadığını göstermiştir. 
Much research has investigated plagiarism in different educational contexts; however, very little research has investigated English-as-a-foreign language students’ ethic from gender and impression management perspectives in Turkish EFL context. Academic dishonesty scale, impression management scale, and personal attributes questionnaire were used to collect data. This survey investigates Turkish EFL-majoring students’ attitudes towards academic behaviors, impression management, and psychological gender. Data were collected from 285 EFL majoring students from 3 state universities in Turkey. The results of this present study showed that first, all students have a moderate level of cheating behavior, they have varying level of beliefs about cheating behavior, there are no significant cheating behavior differences by gender. 
  • Alzahrani, S. M., Salim, N., & Abraham, A. (2012). Understanding plagiarism linguistic patterns, textual features, and detection methods. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Re-views), 42(2), 133-149.
  • Angelil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen language? Plagiarism in writing. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Beasley, J. D. (2004). The impact of technology on plagiarism prevention and detection: Research process automa-tion, a new approach for prevention. In Plagiarism: Prevention, Practice and Policies 2004: Joint Infor-mation Systems Committee Plagiarism Advisory Service Conference (pp. 28-30).
  • Becker, D. A. & Ulstad, I. (2007). Gender differences in student ethics: Are females really more ethical? Plagiary: Cross‐Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 77-91.
  • Bolin, A. U. (2004). Self-control, perceived opportunity, and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty. The Journal of Psychology, 138(2), 101-114.
  • Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research.
  • Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2009). A model for determining student plagiarism: Electronic detection and academic judgement. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 6(1), 47-60.
  • Carroll, J., & Appleton, J. (2001). A good practice guide. JISC report.
  • Coughlin, P. E. (2015). Plagiarism in five universities in Mozambique: Magnitude, detection techniques, and control measures. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 11(1), 1-19.
  • Eriksson, L., & McGee, T. R. (2015). Academic dishonesty amongst Australian criminal justice and policing universi-ty students: Individual and contextual factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 11(1), 1-15.
  • Fezatte, A. (2009). The NEO personality inventory, attitudes, and academic dishonesty. Retrieved from https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/undergraduateresearch/52966/items/1.0086030 on 17.11.2017
  • Hodges, A., Bickham, T., Schmidt, E., & Seawright, L. (2017). Challenging the profiles of a plagiarist: a study of ab-stracts submitted to an international interdisciplinary conference. International Journal for Educational In-tegrity, 13(1), 1-15.
  • Hollinger, R. C., & Lanza-Kaduce, L. (1996). Academic dishonesty and the perceived effectiveness of countermeas-ures: An empirical survey of cheating at a major public university. NASPA journal, 33(4), 292-306.
  • Jolly, P. (1998). The ethics of plagiarism. (ERIC Document Reproduct Service No. ED421725).
  • Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 233-247.
  • Lambert, E. G., & Hogan, N. L. (2004). Academic dishonesty among criminal justice majors: A research note. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 29(1), 1-20.
  • Leming, JS (1980) Cheating behavior, subject variables, and components of the internal-external scale under high and
  • Low-risk conditions. Journal of Education Research, 74(2):83–87.
  • Macaulay, A. D. & Lemm, K. M. (2014). Socioeconomic status and academically dishonest behavior. Presented in aposter session at the Western Psychological Association conference, Portland, OR.
  • McCabe, D. L. & Trevino, L. K., (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 521-538.
  • McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of re-search. Ethics &Behavior, 11(3), 219-232.
  • Murdock, T. B., Hale, N. M., & Weber, M. J. (2001). Predictors of cheating among early adoles-cents: Academic and social motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1):96-115.
  • Nonis, S. & Swift, C.O. (2001). An Examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dis-honesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69-77
  • O'Neill, H. M. (2012). The impact of honour codes and perceptions of cheating on academic cheating behaviours, es-pecially for MBA bound undergraduates. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 21(3), 231-245.
  • Oxford English Dictionary (2009). Accessed from http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/plagiarize?view=uk on 17.11.2017
  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people's) words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488.
  • Pavela, G. (1978). Judicial review of academic decision making after Horowitz. NOLPE School Law Journal, 8(1), 55-75.
  • Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others' words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201-230.
  • Sayed, N., & Lento, C. (2015). The impact of technology on academic dishonesty: Perspectives from accounting fac-ulty. The Accounting Educators’ Journal, (Special Edition), 65-87.
  • Singh, V., Kumra, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2002). Gender and impression management: Playing the promotion game. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1), 77-89.
  • Stern, E. B., & Havlicek, L. (1986). Academic misconduct: Results of faculty and undergraduate student sur-veys. Journal of Allied Health, 15(2), 129-142.
  • Thomas, M. W. (2000). Eschewing credit: Heywood, Shakespeare, and plagiarism before copyright. New Literary His-tory, 31(2), 277-293.
  • Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Educa-tion, 39(3), 235-274.
  • Wilhoit, S. (1994). Helping students avoid plagiarism. College Teaching, 42(4), 161-164.
  • Witmer, H., & Johansson, J. (2015). Disciplinary action for academic dishonesty: does the student’s gender mat-ter? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 11(1), 1-10.
  • Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., Betz, E. (2002). A Domain specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263–290.
Birincil Dil en
Konular Eğitim, Bilimsel Disiplinler
Dergi Bölümü Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yazar: Muzaffer Barın
Kurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Erzurum
Ülke: Turkey


Yazar: Turgay Han
Kurum: Ordu Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Ordu
Ülke: Turkey


Yazar: Nilüfer Aybirdi
Kurum: Kafkas Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümü, Kars
Ülke: Turkey


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { kefdergi457358, journal = {Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi}, issn = {}, eissn = {2147-9844}, address = {Kastamonu Üniversitesi}, year = {2018}, volume = {26}, pages = {1785 - 1792}, doi = {10.24106/kefdergi.3185}, title = {An investigation on Turkish EFL Majoring Students’ Unethical Behaviors}, key = {cite}, author = {Han, Turgay and Aybirdi, Nilüfer and Barın, Muzaffer} }
APA Barın, M , Han, T , Aybirdi, N . (2018). An investigation on Turkish EFL Majoring Students’ Unethical Behaviors. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26 (5), 1785-1792. DOI: 10.24106/kefdergi.3185
MLA Barın, M , Han, T , Aybirdi, N . "An investigation on Turkish EFL Majoring Students’ Unethical Behaviors". Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 26 (2018): 1785-1792 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/kefdergi/issue/39025/457358>
Chicago Barın, M , Han, T , Aybirdi, N . "An investigation on Turkish EFL Majoring Students’ Unethical Behaviors". Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 26 (2018): 1785-1792
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - An investigation on Turkish EFL Majoring Students’ Unethical Behaviors AU - Muzaffer Barın , Turgay Han , Nilüfer Aybirdi Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.3185 DO - 10.24106/kefdergi.3185 T2 - Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 1785 EP - 1792 VL - 26 IS - 5 SN - -2147-9844 M3 - doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.3185 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3185 Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi An investigation on Turkish EFL Majoring Students’ Unethical Behaviors %A Muzaffer Barın , Turgay Han , Nilüfer Aybirdi %T An investigation on Turkish EFL Majoring Students’ Unethical Behaviors %D 2018 %J Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi %P -2147-9844 %V 26 %N 5 %R doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.3185 %U 10.24106/kefdergi.3185
ISNAD Barın, Muzaffer , Han, Turgay , Aybirdi, Nilüfer . "İngilizceyi Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğrenen Türk Öğrencilerin Etik Olmayan Davranışları Üzerine Bir Araştırma". Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 26 / 5 (Eylül 2018): 1785-1792. http://dx.doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3185