Yıl 2018, Cilt 7, Sayı 3, Sayfalar 21 - 34 2018-09-29

GİRİŞİMCİLİK KİŞİLİĞİNİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ
THE INFLUENCE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP PERSONALITY ON ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION

Çağatan Taşkın [1] , Onur Öztürk [2] , Ahmet Akif Karadamar [3]

46 48

Amaç: Girişimcilik ve girişimcilerin sahip olduğu kişilik özelliklerini anlamak, günümüzde ülkelerin karşılaştığı ekonomik problemler düşünüldüğünde oldukça önemli hale gelmiştir. İlgili yazında görüleceği üzere kişilik özelliklerinin girişimcilik niyetleri üzerinde büyük bir etkisi vardır. Girişimciliğe yönelik tutumların kişilik özellikleriyle tartışılmaya müsait olması nedeniyle bu çalışma hangi kişilik özelliklerinin girişimcilik niyetleri üzerinde etkili olduğunu aydınlatmaya çalışmaktadır.

Tasarım/metodoloji/yöntem: Bu çalışmada kolayda örnekleme yöntemi seçilmiştir. Veriler yapılandırılmış anketler aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Girişimcilik kişiliği özelliklerinin üniversite öğrencilerinin girişimcilik niyetleri üzerindeki etkisini ölçmek üzere yapısal eşitlik modelleme kullanılmıştır.

Bulgular: Modelleme sonuçları girişimcilik kişilik özelliklerinin üniversite öğrencilerinin girişimcilik niyetleri üzerinde etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Girişimcilik niyeti ülkelerin ekonomik olarak gelişmesinde en etkili faktör olarak görülmektedir. Araştırma bulguları belirli kişilik özelliklerinin girişimcilik niyetini önemli ölçüde etkilediğini göstermektedir.

Araştırma kısıtları/çıkarımları: Araştırma sonuçları makro ve mikro seviyelerdeki yükseköğretim kurumlarındaki yöneticiler için kaynak dağıtımı ve karar verme açısından faydalı çıkarımlar içermektedir.

Özgünlük/değer: Bu çalışma hangi kişilik özelliklerinin girişimcilik niyetini etkilediğini gösteren bulgular içermektedir. Çalışma; oldukça sanayileşmiş bir şehir olan Bursa’da öğrencilerin girişimcilik kişilik özelliklerinin girişimcilik niyetine etkilerini inceleyen az sayıdaki çalışmadan biridir.

Purpose –Understanding entrepreneurship and the personality traits of entrepreneurs became a critical issue because of the economic problems that countries face today. Personality traits have a great role in entrepreneurial intentions as it can be seen in the related literature. The attitudes toward entrepreneurship are available to discuss by personality traits, this paper intends to shed light on which traits of personality have effects on entrepreneurial intentions.

Design/methodology/approach –The convenience sampling method was chosen to apply in the research. The data were collected by a structured questionnaire. Structural equation modelling is used to test the influence of entrepreneurship personality traits on entrepreneurial intention of university students.

Findings –Modelling results indicate that entrepreneurship personality has an influence on the university students’ entrepreneurial intention. The intention of entrepreneurship is considered to be the most effective factor on the countries’ economic development. Research findings show that certain personality traits are related with entrepreneurial intention significantly.

Research limitations/implications–The research results provide implications for the decision makers who work for higher education establishments at macro and micro levels, in terms of efficient allocation of resources and decision making.

Originality/value–This paper ensures empirical insights about which personality characteristics affect intentions of entrepreneurship. This research is one of the few studies which examined the influence of entrepreneurship personality on entrepreneurship intentions of students in a highly industrialized province, Bursa.

  • Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R. and Ray, S. (2003). „A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development“,Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 18, pp. 105-123.
  • Becherer, R. C. andMaurer, J.G. (1999). „The proactive personality disposition and entrepreneurial behavior among small company presidents“,Journal of Small Business Management, January, pp. 28-36.
  • Brandsatter, H. (2011). „Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses“,Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 51, pp. 222-230.
  • Busenitz, L. W. (1996). „Research on entrepreneurial alertness“,Journal of Small Business Management, October, pp. 35-44.
  • Brice, J. (2004). „The role of personality dimensions on the formation of entrepreneurial intentions“, In Annual Usasbe National Conference, Vol. 18.
  • Carraher, S. M., Welsh, D. HB. and Svilokos, A. (2016). „Validation of a measure of social entrepreneurship“, Journal of International Management, Vol.10 No.4, pp. 386-402.
  • Chell, E. (2008). „The entrepreneurial personality, a social construction“,Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2nd Edition, London.
  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). „What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications“, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.78 No.1, pp. 98-104.
  • Çetin, F. and Varoğlu, A. K. (2009). „Özellikler bağlamında girişimcinin beş faktör kişilik örüntüsü“, Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, Vol.8 No.2, pp. 51-66.
  • Çolakoğlu, N. and Gözükara, İ. (2016). „A Comparison Study on Personality Traits Based on the Attitudes of University Students toward Entrepreneurship“,Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,Vol.229, pp. 133-140.
  • Diaz, F. and Rodriguez, A. (2003). „Locus of control, nAch and values of community entrepreneurs“,Social Behavior and Personality, Vol.31 No.8, pp.739-748.
  • De Pillis, E. and Reardon, K.K. (2007). „The influence of personality traits and persuasive messages on entrepreneurial intention: A cross-cultural comparison“,Career Development International,Vol.12 No.4, pp. 382-396.
  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). „Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics“, Journal of Marketing Research, pp. 382-388.
  • Gaglio, C. M. and Katz, J. A. (2001). „The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness“,Small Business Economics, Vol.16, pp. 95-111.
  • Gürol, Y. and Atsan, N. (2006). „Entrepreneurial characteristics amongst university students, some insights for entrepreneurship education and training in Turkey“, Education+Training, Vol.48 No.1, pp. 25-38.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. (2011). „PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet“, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol.19 No.2, pp. 139-152.
  • Hansemark, O. C. (1998). „The effects of an entrepreneurship programme on need for achievement and locus of control reinforcement“,International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior&Research, Vol.4 No.1, pp.28-50.
  • Hull, D. L., Bosley, J. J. andUdell, G. G. (1980). „Renewing the hunt for the heffalump: Identifying potential entrepreneurs by personality characteristics“,Journal of Small Business Management, Vol.18 No.1, pp.11-18.
  • Junior, E. G. (2016). „Personality traits and shame to entrepreneurship“, Sociology Study, Vol.6 No.12, pp. 766-774.
  • Klotz, A. C. and Neubaum, D. O. (2016). „Research on the dark side of personality traits in entrepreneurship: Observations from an organizational behavior perspective“, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol.40 No.1, pp. 7-17.
  • Koh, H. C. (1996). „Testing hypotheses of entrepreneurial characteristics, a study of Hong Kong mba students“,Journal of Managerial Psychology,Vol.11 No.3, pp.12-25.
  • Lachman, R. (1980). „Toward measurement of entrepreneurial tendencies“,Management International Review, Vol.20 No.2, pp. 108-116.
  • Lee, D. Y. and Tsang, E.W.K. (2001). „The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth“,Journal of Management Studies, Vol.38 No.4, pp. 583-602.
  • Lim, W., Lee, Y. L. and Ramasamy, R. (2015). „Personality, prior knowledge, social capital and entrepreneurial intentions: Entrepreneurial alertness as mediator“,Global Journal of Business and Social Science Review,Vol.2 No.1, pp. 68-78.
  • Liñán, F., Rodríguez-Cohard, J.C. and Rueda-Cantuche, J.M. (2011). „Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: a role for education“,International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal,Vol.7 No.2, pp. 195-218.
  • Lumpkin, G. T. and Dess, G.G. (1996). „Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance“,Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21 No.1, pp. 135-172.
  • Miller, D. (2016). „Response to research on the dark side of personality traits in entrepreneurship: Observations from an organizational behavior perspective“, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol.40 No.1, pp. 19-25.
  • Moriano, J.A., Gorgievski, M., Laguna, M., Stephan, U. and Zarafshani, K. (2012). „A cross-cultural approach to understanding entrepreneurial intention“,Journal of Career Development,Vol.39 No.2, pp. 162-185.
  • Mueller, S.L. (2004). „Gender gaps in potential for entrepreneurship across countries and cultures“,Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Vol.9 No.3, pp. 199-220.
  • Obschonka, M., Fisch, C. and Boyd, R. (2017). „Using digital footprints in entrepreneurship research: A twitter-based personality analysis of superstar entrepreneurs and managers“, Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Vol.8, pp. 13-23.
  • Obschonka, M., Hakkarainen, K., Lonka, K. and Salmela-Aro, K. (2017). „Entrepreneurship as a twenty-first century skill: Entrepreneurial alertness and intention in the transition to adulthood“, Small Business Economics, Vol.48 No.3, pp. 487-501.
  • O’Regan, N. andGhobadian, A. (2005). „Innovation in SMEs: the impact of strategic orientation and environmental perceptions“,International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol.54 No.2, pp. 81-97.
  • Owoseni, O.O. (2014). „The influence of some personality factors on entrepreneurial intentions“,International Journal of Business and Social Science,Vol.5 No.1, pp.278-284.
  • Ozaralli, N. and Rivenburgh, N.K. (2016). "Entrepreneurial intention: antecedents to entrepreneurial behavior in the USA and Turkey." Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Vol.6 No.3, pp. 1-32.
  • Reimes-Hild, C.I., King, J.W., Foster, J.E., Fritz, S., Waller, S.S. and Wheeler, D.W. (2005). „A framework for the „entrepreneurial“ learner of the 21st century“,Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol.8 No.2,pp.1-11.
  • Rezaei, S. (2015). „Segmenting consumer decision-making styles (CDMS) toward marketing practice: A partial least squares (PLS) path modeling approach“Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,Vol.22, pp. 1-15.
  • Sagie, A. and Elizur, D. (1999). „Achievement motive and entrepreneurial orientation: a structural analysis“,Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.20, pp. 375-387.
  • Staniewski, M. W., Janowski, K. and Awruk, K. (2016). „Entrepreneurial personality dispositions and selected indicators of company functioning“, Journal of Business Research, Vol.69 No.5, pp. 1939-1943.
  • Utsch, A. and Rauch, A. (2000). „Innovativeness and initiative as mediators between achievement orientation and venture performance“,European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol.9 No.1, pp.45-62.
  • Van de Ven, A.H. (1986). „Central problems in the management of innovation“,Management Science, Vol.32 No.5, pp. 590-607.
  • Viinikainen, J., Heineck, G., Böckerman, P., Hintsanen, M., Raitakari, O. and Pehkonen, J. (2017). „Born entrepreneur? Adolescents‘ personality characteristics and self-employment in adulthood“, Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Vol.8, pp. 9-12
  • Wang, W., Lu, W. and Millington, J.K. (2011). „Determinants of entrepreneurial intention among college students in China and USA“,Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research,Vol.1No.1, pp. 35-44.
  • Yurtkoru, E. S., Acar, P. and Teraman, B. S. (2014). „Willingness to take risk and entrepreneurial intention of university students: An empirical study comparing private and state universities“,Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,Vol.150, pp. 834-840.
Konular İktisat
Dergi Bölümü Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yazar: Çağatan Taşkın (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Ülke: Turkey


Yazar: Onur Öztürk
Kurum: ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Ülke: Turkey


Yazar: Ahmet Akif Karadamar
Kurum: ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Ülke: Turkey


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { klujfeas379213, journal = {Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {2146-3417}, eissn = {2587-2052}, address = {Kırklareli Üniversitesi}, year = {2018}, volume = {7}, pages = {21 - 34}, doi = {}, title = {GİRİŞİMCİLİK KİŞİLİĞİNİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ}, key = {cite}, author = {Taşkın, Çağatan and Öztürk, Onur and Karadamar, Ahmet Akif} }
APA Taşkın, Ç , Öztürk, O , Karadamar, A . (2018). GİRİŞİMCİLİK KİŞİLİĞİNİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (3), 21-34. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/klujfeas/issue/39222/379213
MLA Taşkın, Ç , Öztürk, O , Karadamar, A . "GİRİŞİMCİLİK KİŞİLİĞİNİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ". Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 7 (2018): 21-34 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/klujfeas/issue/39222/379213>
Chicago Taşkın, Ç , Öztürk, O , Karadamar, A . "GİRİŞİMCİLİK KİŞİLİĞİNİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ". Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 7 (2018): 21-34
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - GİRİŞİMCİLİK KİŞİLİĞİNİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ AU - Çağatan Taşkın , Onur Öztürk , Ahmet Akif Karadamar Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - DO - T2 - Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 21 EP - 34 VL - 7 IS - 3 SN - 2146-3417-2587-2052 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi GİRİŞİMCİLİK KİŞİLİĞİNİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ %A Çağatan Taşkın , Onur Öztürk , Ahmet Akif Karadamar %T GİRİŞİMCİLİK KİŞİLİĞİNİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ %D 2018 %J Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi %P 2146-3417-2587-2052 %V 7 %N 3 %R %U
ISNAD Taşkın, Çağatan , Öztürk, Onur , Karadamar, Ahmet Akif . "GİRİŞİMCİLİK KİŞİLİĞİNİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ". Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 7 / 3 (Eylül 2018): 21-34.