Yıl 2018, Cilt 2, Sayı 1, Sayfalar 78 - 95 2018-06-30

Metaphors and Meaning in the Turkish Contemporary Christian Music

Uğur Aslan [1]

63 64

The aim of this article is to investigate the musical experience, musical meaning, and metaphors in religious music in the case of Turkish Contemporary Christian Music (TCCM). In the general sense, we can say that Contemporary Christian Music simultaneously carries symbolic, functional, and pragmatic meaning. Thus, this paper focuses on how Turkish Christians apply metaphors in order to give meaning to TCCM in the process of expressing experiences, and what other elements, unrelated to music, play a role in this process. People use the metaphors in music in two ways: to explain their experience of music and to give meaning to music, and to create music according to their ideas or beliefs. In this context, music as practical consciousness affects the metaphors used for musical practices as discursive consciousness; but also metaphors as discursive consciousness affect musical practices by creating proper sound in accordance with ideas or beliefs about music. In the context of TCCM, metaphors are used for expressing supernatural or transcendent experience as well as for sounding worship and link the worship music to the religious belief.
Metaphor, Musical Meaning, Musical Experience, Turkish Contemporary Christian Music
  • Abelman, Robert. (2006). “Without Divine Intervention: Contemporary Christian Music Radio and Audience Transference”. Journal of Media and Religion. 5(4): 209-231.
  • Aslan, Uğur; Yükselsin, İbrahim Yavuz. (2015). “Popular Music in Protestant Rituals: Izmir Contemporary Worship Scene”. The Journal of International Social Research. 8(40): 876- 888.
  • Blacking, John. (1979). “The Study of Man as Music-Maker”. The Performing Arts. Ed. John Blacking: 3-16. Bristol: Mouton Publishers.
  • Blacking, John. (1995). “Expressing Human Experience Through Music”. Music, Culture, Experience: Selected Papers of John Blacking. Ed. Reginald Byron: 31-53. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Boiles, Charles L. (1982). “Process of Musical Semiosis”. Yearbook for Traditional Music. 14: 24-44.
  • Bohlman, Philip. (2003). “Sacred Popular Music of the Mediterranean The Journey to Jerusalem”. Mediterranean Mosaic. Ed. Goffredo Plastino: 287-306. New York: Routledge.
  • Brown, Steven. (2003). “Biomusicology, and Three Biological Paradoxes About Music”. Bulletin of Psychology and The Arts. 4(1): 15-17.
  • Campbell, Patricia Shehan. (2010). Song In Their Head: Music and It’s Meaning In Children’s Lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cross, Ian. (2001). “Music, Mind and Evolution”. Psychology of Music. 29(1): 95-102.
  • DeNora, Tia. (1986). ‘How is Extra-Musical Meaning Possible? Music as a Place and Space for “Work”’. Sociological Theory. 4(1): 84-94.
  • Dumbauld, Ben. (2012). “Worship Music and Cultural Politics in the Chinese-American Church”. Ethnomusicology Review. 17. Retrieved from http://ethnomusicologyreview.ucla.edu/journal/volume/17/piece/590
  • Engelhardt, Jeffers (2011). “Music, Sound, and Religion”. Cultural Study of Music. Ed. Martin Clayton, Trevor Herbert, and Richard Middleton: 299-307 New York, London: Routledge.
  • Feld, Steven. (1984). “Sound Structure as Social Structure". Ethnomusicology. 28(3): 383-409.
  • Geertz, Clifford. (1993). “Religion as a Cultural System”. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. London: Fontana Press.
  • Giddens, Anthony. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Gormly, Eric. (2003). “Evangelizing Through Appropriation: Toward a Cultural Theory on the Growth of Contemporary Christian Music”. Journal of Media and Religion. 2(4): 251-265.
  • Larsen, Gretchen; Rob Lawson; and Sarah Todd. (2010). “The Symbolic Consumption of Music”. Journal of Marketing Management. 26(7-8): 671-685.
  • Lakoff, George; Johnson, Mark. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. London: The University of Chicago Press. Mantare, Saku; Sillince, John A. A.; and Hämäläinen, Virpi. (2007). “Music as a Metaphor For Organizational Change”. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 20(3): 447-459.
  • Meyer, Leonard B. (1956). Emotion and Meaning in Music. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Nettl, Bruno. (2015). “The Basic Unit of All Culture and Civilization: Signs, Symbols, and Meaning”. The Study of Ethnomusicology: Thirty-Three Discussions. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  • Pang, Katherine. (2017). “Contemporary Christian Music”. Evangelical America: An Encyclopedia of Contemporary American Religious Culture. Ed. Timothy J. Demy and Paul R. Shockley. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. Pp. 82-84.
  • Pierce, Charles Sanders. (1894). "What is a Sign?" Manuscript. Accessed November 29, 2017. Retrieved from http://www.iupui.edu/%7Epeirce/web/ep/ep2/ep2book/ch02/ep2ch2.htm.
  • Rice, Timothy. (2001). “Reflections on Music and Meaning: Metaphor, Signification and Control in The Bulgarian Case”. British Journal of Ethnomusicology. 10(1): 19-38.
  • Rice, Timothy. (2003). “Time, Place, and Metaphor in Musical Experience and Ethnography”. Ethnomusicology. 47(2): 151-179. Robertson, Carol. (1976). “Tayil as a Category and Communication among the Argentine Mapuche: A Methodological Suggestion”. Yearbook of the International Folk Music Council. 8: 35-52.
  • Tolbert, Elizabeth. (2001). “Music and Meaning: An Evolutionary Story”. Psychology of Music 29: 84-94. Vannini, Philip; Dennis Waskul. (2006). “Symbolic Interaction as Music: The Esthetic Constitution of Meaning, Self, and Society”. Symbolic Interaction 29(1): 5-18.
  • Zangwill, Nick. (2011). “Music, Essential Metaphor, and Private Language”. American Philospohical Quarterly. 48(1): 1-16.
  • Kervan, Cem. (2005). “Dem Geldi Dem”. Bursa (Turkey): Bağ Müzik Yapım.
  • Paul Baloche. (2011). “Worship Band Workshop: Roadmap to a Skilled Team”. Modern Worship Series. Leadworship. US
  • Buckley, Mike. (12.05.2015). Personal Communication.
  • Van Den Heuvel, Martijn. (10.03.2015). Personal Communication.
Birincil Dil en
Konular Sosyal
Dergi Bölümü Articles
Yazarlar

Yazar: Uğur Aslan
Kurum: Trabzon University State Conservatory
Ülke: Turkey


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { musicologist439254, journal = {Musicologist}, issn = {}, eissn = {2618-5652}, address = {Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi}, year = {2018}, volume = {2}, pages = {78 - 95}, doi = {}, title = {Metaphors and Meaning in the Turkish Contemporary Christian Music}, key = {cite}, author = {Aslan, Uğur} }
APA Aslan, U . (2018). Metaphors and Meaning in the Turkish Contemporary Christian Music. Musicologist, 2 (1), 78-95. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/musicologist/issue/36330/439254
MLA Aslan, U . "Metaphors and Meaning in the Turkish Contemporary Christian Music". Musicologist 2 (2018): 78-95 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/musicologist/issue/36330/439254>
Chicago Aslan, U . "Metaphors and Meaning in the Turkish Contemporary Christian Music". Musicologist 2 (2018): 78-95
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Metaphors and Meaning in the Turkish Contemporary Christian Music AU - Uğur Aslan Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - DO - T2 - Musicologist JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 78 EP - 95 VL - 2 IS - 1 SN - -2618-5652 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Musicologist Metaphors and Meaning in the Turkish Contemporary Christian Music %A Uğur Aslan %T Metaphors and Meaning in the Turkish Contemporary Christian Music %D 2018 %J Musicologist %P -2618-5652 %V 2 %N 1 %R %U
ISNAD Aslan, Uğur . "Metaphors and Meaning in the Turkish Contemporary Christian Music". Musicologist 2 / 1 (Haziran 2018): 78-95.