Yıl 2017, Cilt 7, Sayı 3, Sayfalar 605 - 608 2017-11-28

Doğu Karadeniz’de Moğol Hâkimiyeti

İlhan Aslan [1]

207 382

 Before the Mongols established a rule around the Eastern Black Sea region, this are had staged a power struggle between the Anatolian Seljuks and Trebizond Byzantium. As a result to that, the are a was divided between the Anatolian Seljuk and Trebizond Pontic states. Also, Trebizond Pontos became a client state to Anatolian Seljuks. Starting of the Mongol rule in the Eastern Black Sea Region occurs after the Battle of Kösedağ in 1243. Around this time, Alaeddin Keykubad I was on Anatolian Seljuk throne. The Mongolian treat that started during his time reached a maximum with the invasion of Erzurum and Erzincan during Giyaseddin Keyhüsrev II’s tenure. After this battle the Anatolian Seljuks and the Trebizond Pontics both came under the souzerainty of Mongols. No information is found regarding the deal between the Trebizond Pontics and the Mongols. But the information provided by the Latin traveller Rubruck provids regarding a Trebizond Governor named Guido paying taxes to Mongols is a proof of this fact. It is observed that the Mongols who ruled the area were in relation mostly to Anatolian Seljuks. That Dokuz Khatun, the spouse of Ilkhan Hulagu was Christian helped Mongols establish good relations with Trebizond Pontics. Sacking of Bayburt, İspir, Aras Valley, Erzurum, Şavşat and Artvin happened as the result of such good relations. But such good relations didn’t last long. The continuous changing of power around the Eastern Black Sea region caused changes in the policies of Mongols. It also makes among the leading reasons that the Turkmens fleeing from the Mongolian invasion had prevented the establishment of a certain souvereignty around the region. In addition to that, the sacking of the region from the Fortuna stream, Çoruh river, Artvin, Borçka, Şaşat, Ardanuç, Yusufeli, all the way to Torul by the Orthodox Kipchaks headed by the Pope Sargis, weakened the power of Trebizond Pontics. Such details set basis to the alliance between the Anatolian Seljuks and the Mongols. Hence the Mongol Khan Abaka provided support to Anatolian Seljuks against the Trebizond Pontic swho set a campaign on Sinop. As a result of that, the city returned back to Anatolian Seljuk control. But the alliance between the Mongols and the Anatolian Seljuks did not last very long. Invitation of Mongols to Anatolia by the Anatolian Seljuk vizier Muiniddin Pervane Süleyman, and the invasion of Elbistan by the Mongols broket he Seljuk-Mongol alliance. Abaka Khan held Vizier Muiniddin Pervane responcible and had him killed. As the Mongols faced a Mamluk threat from the south, they couldn’t pay much attention to Eastern Black Sea region. The influence of the Mongols, who were not too much interested in the coastal cities, decreased around the Eastern Black Sea region, by the beginning of 14th century. Abaka Khan’s preparation to a campaign in 1280 on the Mamluks is a proof of this fact. Thus the Mongols didn’t haveany further campaing towards the Eastern Black Sea region from that date on. But, it might be said that the Mongols kept an eye on Trebizond. Trebizond is an important location for being a sea port. The in fromation provided by the Ilkahanate historian Rashid-al-Dîn about this matter is important. Rashid-al-Dîn shared the information about the Byzantian province sand the northern gulfs that Mawlana Kutb-al-Dîn Shirazi had obtained from the maps, with the Mongols. Though the Mongols headed south, they were naturally intersted in affairs around Eastern Black Sea. This papers tudies the policies of the Mongols regarding the Eastern Black Sea region. The Mongolian invasion was not influencive only around the Central and Eastern Anatolia. An other geography that the Mongols were influencive was Eastern Black Sea. But the sources do not include sufficient information regarding the affects of the Mongols on Black Sea. Therefore the studies on the region offer many difficulties. This paper tries to comment the infromation obtained from the sources of the era and the research works, and thus to provide information regarding the Mongol influence around the Eastern Black Sea. It also aims to politically, economically, and socially examine the history of theregion, as much as the help the sources provide. Hence, the history of the region in the mentioned centuries has been evaluated from all aspects. Thus, the influences of theMongol rule are the Eastern Black Sea region have been elucidated.

Doğu Karadeniz, Moğollar, Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti
  • AHMED B. MAHMUD (1977). Selçuk-nâme, Haz. Erdoğan Merçil, C. II, İstanbul: Tercüman 1001 Temel Eser.
  • ALAEDDİN ATA MELİK CÜVEYNÎ (1999). Tarih-i Cihangüşa, çev Mürsel Öztürk, Ankara: TC. Kültür Bakanlığı Yay.
  • BREHIER, L. (1977). The Life and Death of Byzantium (Europe in the Middle Ages, selected studies), Trans. M. Vaughan, New York: North-Holland.
  • BREYER, A. A. M. (1975). Greeks and Türkmens: The Pontic Exception, Dumbarton Oaks Paper, 29: s. 113-149.
  • BREYER, A. A. M. (1994). The Grand Komnenos and Great Khan at Karakorum in 1246, Res Orientales V, Itinéraites d’Orient Hommages a Claude Cahen: s. 257-261.
  • BROSSET, M. F. (1849). Histoire de la Géorgie, C. I, Saint-Petersbourg: Imprimerie de l’Académie Imperiale des Sciences.
  • FALLMERAYER, J. P. (2011). Trabzon İmparatorluğunun Tarihi, çev. Ahmet Cevat Eren, Haz. Celalettin Yavuz-İsmail Hacı Fettahoğlu, Not. İbrahim Tellioğlu, Ankara: TTK Yay.
  • FİNLAY, G. (1851). The History of Greece and the Empire of Trebizond, London: Blackwood and Sons.
  • GALSTYAN, A. G. (2005). Ermeni Kaynaklarına Göre Moğollar, çev. İlyas Kamalov, İstanbul: Yeditepe Yay.
  • GEORGIOS AKROPOLİTES (2008). Vekayinâme, çev. Bilge Umar, İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yay.
  • GREGORY ABÛ’L-FARAC (BAR HEBRAEUS) (1999). Abû’l-Farac Tarihi, çev. Ömer Rıza Doğrul, C. II, Ankara: TTK Yay.
  • İBN BİBİ (1996). el-Evamirü’l-Ala’iye fi’l-Umuri’l-Ala’iye, çev. Mürsel Öztürk, C. I, Ankara: TC. Kültür Bakanlığı Yay.
  • JANSSENS, E. (1969). Trebizonde en Colchide, Bruxelles: Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles.
  • KARPOV, S. P. (2007). İstoriya Trapezundskoy İmperii, Saint-Petersburg: Aletevya.
  • KAYMAZ, N. (2009), II. Gıyâseddin Keyhüsrev ve Devri, Ankara.
  • KEÇİŞ, M. (2013). Trabzon Rum İmparatorluğu ve Türkler (1204-1404), Ankara: TTK Yay.
  • KERÎMÜDDİN MAHMUD-I AKSARAYÎ (2000). Müsâmeretü’l-Ahbâr, çev. Mürsel Öztürk, Ankara: TTK Yay.
  • MÜNECCİMBAŞI AHMED B. LÜTFULLAH (2017). Câmiu’d-Düvel, Haz. Ali Öngül, C. II, İstanbul: Kabalcı Yay.
  • MÜVERRİH VARDAN (2017). Türk Fetihleri Tarihi (889-1269), çev. Hrant D. Andreasyan, Haz. İlhan Aslan, İstanbul: Post Yay.
  • REŞİDÜDDİN FAZLULLAH (2013). Câmiu’t-Tevârih, çev. İsmail Aka-Mehmet Ersan-Ahmed Hesamipour Khelejani, Ankara: TTK Yay.
  • RUKNU’D-DÎN EL-MANSÛrÎ EL-DEVÂDÂR EL-HATALÎ BAYBARS (2000). Baybars Tarihi, çev. Şerefüddin Yaltkaya, Ankara: TTK Yay.
  • SPULER, B. (2011). İran Moğolları, çev. Cemal Köprülü, Ankara: TTK Yay.
  • SÜMER, F. (1970). Anadolu’da Moğollar, Selçuklu Araştırmaları Dergisi, I: s. 1-147.
  • SÜMER, F. (1999). Oğuzlar (Türkmenler) Tarihleri-Boy Teşkilatı Destanları, İstanbul: TDAV Yay.
  • TARÎH-İ AL-İ SELÇUK, (ANONİM SELÇUKNÂME) (2014). çev. Halil İbrahim Gök-Fahrettin Coşguner, Ankara: Atıf Yay.
  • TELLİOĞLU, İ. (2015). Tarih Boyunca Karadeniz, Trabzon: Serander Yay.
  • TOGAN, Z. V. (1981). Umumî Türk Tarihine Giriş, İstanbul: Enderun Kitabevi.
  • WILHELM VON RUBRUCK (2012). Moğolların Büyük Hanına Seyahat, çev. Ergin Ayan, İstanbul: Ayışığı Yay.
  • WINFIELD, D. (1962). A Note on the South-Eastern Borders of the Empire of Trebizond in the Thirteenth Century, Anatolian Studies, XII: s. 163-172.
Konular Tarih
Dergi Bölümü MAKALE
Yazarlar

Yazar: İlhan Aslan
Ülke: Turkey


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { odusobiad342065, journal = {ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD)}, issn = {1309-9302}, address = {Ordu Üniversitesi}, year = {2017}, volume = {7}, pages = {605 - 608}, doi = {}, title = {Doğu Karadeniz’de Moğol Hâkimiyeti}, key = {cite}, author = {Aslan, İlhan} }
APA Aslan, İ . (2017). Doğu Karadeniz’de Moğol Hâkimiyeti. ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD), 7 (3), 605-608. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/odusobiad/issue/32288/342065
MLA Aslan, İ . "Doğu Karadeniz’de Moğol Hâkimiyeti". ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD) 7 (2017): 605-608 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/odusobiad/issue/32288/342065>
Chicago Aslan, İ . "Doğu Karadeniz’de Moğol Hâkimiyeti". ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD) 7 (2017): 605-608
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Doğu Karadeniz’de Moğol Hâkimiyeti AU - İlhan Aslan Y1 - 2017 PY - 2017 N1 - DO - T2 - ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD) JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 605 EP - 608 VL - 7 IS - 3 SN - 1309-9302- M3 - UR - Y2 - 2017 ER -
EndNote %0 ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD) Doğu Karadeniz’de Moğol Hâkimiyeti %A İlhan Aslan %T Doğu Karadeniz’de Moğol Hâkimiyeti %D 2017 %J ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD) %P 1309-9302- %V 7 %N 3 %R %U
ISNAD Aslan, İlhan . "Doğu Karadeniz’de Moğol Hâkimiyeti". ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD) 7 / 3 (Kasım 2017): 605-608.