Yıl 2018, Cilt 11, Sayı 3, Sayfalar 42 - 66 2018-08-03

Pro-Environmental Consumption Behavior: Dimensions And Measurement
Çevreci Tüketim Davranışı: Boyutları ve Ölçümü

İnci Dursun [1] , Ebru Tümer Kabadayı [2] , Ahmet Tuğrul Tuğer [3]

41 102

Pro-environmental consumption behavior, highly emphasized within the scope of sustainable development, has been operationalized with different types and levels in the extant national and international literature. The main objective of this research is to propose a multidimensional "pro-environmental consumption" scale covering behaviors that represent each stage of the consumption process, conceptualizing environmental behavior through a process approach. It was also aimed to explore Turkish consumers’ frequency of behaviors that appeared in different stages of the consumption process and contributed to the reduction of environmental problems, and also examine which behaviors were more closely related to environmental sensitivities. Consequently, data were collected from surveys of 707 participants in Istanbul, Kocaeli, Ankara. As the result of the research, a higher order factor pro-environmental consumption scale, covering two first-order factors (green consumption in pre-purchase stage and recycling behavior in post consumption stage) and one second order factor (energy conservation during consumption stage) has been validated. Moreover, the findings about Turkish consumers’ environmental behavior have been summarized.

Sürdürülebilir kalkınma kapsamında önemle üzerinde durulan çevreci tüketim davranışının ulusal ve uluslararası literatürde farklı şekillerde ve düzeylerde operasyonelleştirildiği görülmektedir. Bu araştırmanın temel amacı çevreci davranışı süreç yaklaşım ile kavramsallaştırarak, tüketim sürecinin her aşamasını temsil eden davranışlardan oluşan çok boyutlu “çevreci tüketim” ölçeğinin önerilmesidir.  Araştırmada aynı zamanda tüketim sürecinin farklı aşamalarında ortaya çıkan ve çevre sorunlarının azaltılmasına katkı sağlayan davranışların Türk tüketicileri tarafından hangi sıklıkta sergilendiği, hangi davranışların çevreci hassasiyetlerle daha yakından ilişkili olduğunun araştırılması hedeflenmiştir. Bu doğrultuda, İstanbul, Kocaeli, Ankara’da toplam 707 katılımcıdan anket yöntemi ile veri toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, iki adet birinci düzey faktör (tüketim öncesinde çevreyi koruyan ürünlerin tercihi olan yeşil tüketim ve tüketim sonrasında geri dönüşüm) ve bir adet ikinci düzey faktörü (kullanım sırasındaki enerji tasarrufu) kapsayan üst düzey çevreci tüketim davranışı ölçeğinin uygun olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca Türk tüketicilerinin çevreci davranışlarının doğasına ilişkin bulgular özetlenmiştir

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273-291.
  • Alwitt, L. F., & Pitts, R. E. (1996). Predicting purchase intentions for an environmentally sensitive product. Journal of consumer psychology, 5(1), 49-64.
  • Antil, J. H. (1984). Socially responsible consumers: Profile and implications for public policy. Journal of Macromarketing, 4(2), 18-39.
  • Argo, J. J., & White, K. (2012). When do consumers eat more? The role of appearance self-esteem and food packaging cues. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 67-80.
  • Axelrod, L. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1993). Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(2), 149-159.
  • Balderjahn, I. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17(1), 51-56.
  • Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environment and Behavior, 35(2), 264-285.
  • Barbarossa, C., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2016). Positive and negative antecedents of purchasing eco-friendly products: A comparison between green and non-green consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 229-247.
  • Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., & Ford, N. (2005). The household energy gap: Examining the divide between habitual-and purchase-related conservation behaviours. Energy Policy, 33(11), 1425-1444.
  • Barr, S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A UK case study of household waste management. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 435-473.
  • Başar, E. E. (2016) Hane halklarının sürdürülebilir tüketim davranışlarının ölçülmesine yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Erzurum.
  • Berger, I. E., & Corbin, R. M. (1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11(2), 79-89.
  • Bodur, M., & Sarigöllü, E. (2005). Environmental sensitivity in a developing country: Consumer classification and implications. Environment and Behavior, 37(4), 487-510.
  • Bratt, C. (1999). The impact of norms and assumed consequences on recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 31(5), 630-656.
  • Bratt, C., Stern, P. C., Matthies, E., & Nenseth, V. (2015). Home, car use, and vacation: The structure of environmentally significant individual behavior. Environment and Behavior, 47(4), 436-473.
  • Chen, M. F., & Tung, P. J. (2010). The moderating effect of perceived lack of facilities on consumers’ recycling intentions. Environment and Behavior, 42(6), 824-844.
  • Cleveland, M., Kalamas, M., & Laroche, M. (2005). Shades of green: Linking environmental locus of control and pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(4), 198-212.
  • d’Astous, A., & Legendre, A. (2009). Understanding consumers’ ethical justifications: A scale for appraising consumers’ reasons for not behaving ethically. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 255-268.
  • De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair‐trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363-385.
  • De Young, R. (1990). Recycling as appropriate behavior: A review of survey data from selected recycling education programs in Michigan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 3(4), 253-266.
  • Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (2003). Green and greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15(4), 441-472.
  • Doğan, O., Bulut, Z. A. ve Çımrın, F. K. (2015). Bireylerin sürdürülebilir tüketim davranişlarinin ölçülmesine yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalişmasi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29(4), 659-678.
  • Dursun, İ., Kabadayı, E. T., Köksal, C. G., & Tuğer, A. T. (2016). Pro-environmental consumption: Is it really all about the environment? Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 3(2), 114-134.
  • Dursun, İ. & Gündüz, S. (2016). Türkiye’de sorumlu tüketim davranışı üzerine araştırmalar: Ulusal makaleler ve lisansüstü tezler üzerine bir derleme. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(4), 1365-1391.
  • Dursun, İ., & Belit, M. (2017). Bir sosyal pazarlama hedefi olarak enerji tasarrufu: tasarruf yöntemleri kullanimina yönelik bir ölçek önerisi. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(3), 130-153.
  • Ellen, P. S., Wiener, J. L., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 102-117.
  • EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) [https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions Erişim Tarihi: 25.01.2018].
  • Fisk, G. (1973). Criteria for a theory of responsible consumption. Journal of Marketing, 37(2), 24-31.
  • Follows, S. B., & Jobber, D. (2000). Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: A test of a consumer model. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6), 723-746.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
  • Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D., & Smith, T. (2011). The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7684-7694.
  • Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(3), 335-362.
  • Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., Cherry, M., & Watkins, M. (2017). Moral, wasteful, frugal, or thrifty? Identifying consumer identities to understand and manage pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 1-26, doi: 10.1177/0013916517733782
  • Gilg, A., Barr, S., & Ford, N. (2005). Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures, 37(6), 481-504.
  • Gonçalves, H. M., Lourenço, T. F., & Silva, G. M. (2016). Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1484-1491.
  • Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27(5), 699-718.
  • Gupta, S., & Agrawal, R. (2017). Environmentally responsible consumption: Construct definition, scale development, and validation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. doi: 10.1002/csr.1476
  • Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
  • Hopper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and Behavior, 23(2), 195-220.
  • Huneke, M. E. (2005) The face of the un-consumer: An empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the united states. Psychology & Marketing, 22(7), 527–550.
  • IEA (2017), International Energy Agency [https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2017.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 25.01.2018].
  • Iwata, O. (2002). Coping style and three psychological measures associated with environmentally responsible behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 30(7), 661-669.
  • Kaiser, F. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(5), 395-422.
  • Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 1-19.
  • Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1531-1544.
  • Karalar, R. ve Kiracı, H. (2010). Bireysel Değerlerin Sürdürülebilir Tüketim Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisini Belirlemeye Yönelik Öğretmenler Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 79-106.
  • Karalar, R. ve Kiracı, H. (2011). Çevresel sorunlara karşı bir çözüm önerisi olarak sürdürülebilir tüketim düşüncesi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (30), 63- 76.
  • Karlin, B., Davis, N., Sanguinetti, A., Gamble, K., Kirkby, D., & Stokols, D. (2014). Dimensions of conservation: Exploring differences among energy behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 46(4), 423-452.
  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research: Educational, Psychological and Sociological Inquiry. New York. Holt. Rinehand and Hinston.
  • Kim, Y., & Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1), 592-599.
  • Kinnear, T. C., Taylor, J. R., & Ahmed, S. A. (1974). Ecologically Concerned Consumers: Who Are They? Journal of Marketing, 38(2), 20-24.
  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
  • Largo-Wight, E., Bian, H., & Lange, L. (2012). An empirical test of an expanded version of the theory of planned behavior in predicting recycling behavior on campus. American Journal of Health Education, 43(2), 66-73.
  • Larson, L. R., Stedman, R. C., Cooper, C. B., & Decker, D. J. (2015). Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 112-124.
  • Lee, J. A., & Holden, S. J. (1999). Understanding the determinants of environmentally conscious behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 16(5), 373-392.
  • Lee, Y. K., Kim, S., Kim, M. S., & Choi, J. G. (2014). Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2097-2105.
  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1981). Voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 243-252.
  • Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117-137.
  • Lorek, S., & Vergragt, P. J. (2015). Sustainable consumption as a systemic challenge: Inter-and transdisciplinary research and research questions. Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption, 19-33.
  • Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 189-204.
  • McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (1994). The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior. Journal of Business Research, 30(1), 53-62.
  • McDonald, S., Oates, C. J., Young, C. W., & Hwang, K. (2006). Toward sustainable consumption: Researching voluntary simplifiers. Psychology & Marketing, 23(6), 515-534.
  • Minton, A. P., & Rose, R. L. (1997). The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendly consumer behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 37-48.
  • Moraes, C., Carrigan, M., & Szmigin, I. (2012). The coherence of inconsistencies: Attitude–behaviour gaps and new consumption communities. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(1-2), 103-128.
  • NOAA (2017), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, [http://www.noaa.gov/resource-collections/ocean-pollution Erişim Tarihi: 28.01.2018].Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind Pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 740-756.
  • OECD (2012). OECD Environmental outlook to 2050. The Consequences of Inaction. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264122246-en
  • Olli, E., Grendstad, G., & Wollebaek, D. (2001). Correlates of environmental behaviors: Bringing back social context. Environment and Behavior, 33(2), 181-208.
  • Onel, N., & Mukherjee, A. (2017). Why do consumers recycle? A holistic perspective encompassing moral considerations, affective responses, and self‐interest motives. Psychology & Marketing, 34(10), 956-971.
  • Oskamp, S., Harrington, M. J., Edwards, T. C., Sherwood, D. L., Okuda, S. M., & Swanson, D. C. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 23(4), 494-519.
  • Ölander, F., & Thøgersen, J. (1995). Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18(4), 345-385.
  • Pagiaslis, A., & Krontalis, A. K. (2014). Green consumption behavior antecedents: Environmental concern, knowledge, and beliefs. Psychology & Marketing, 31(5), 335-348.
  • Peattie, K., & Collins, A. (2009). Guest editorial: Perspectives on sustainable consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 107-112.
  • Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: Behavior and norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 195-228.
  • Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., Green‐Demers, I., Noels, K., & Beaton, A. M. (1998). Why are you doing things for the environment? The motivation toward the environment scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(5), 437-468.
  • Pepper, M., Jackson, T., Uzzell D. (2009). An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 126-136.
  • Peyer, M., Balderjahn, I., Seegebarth, B., & Klemm, A. (2017). The role of sustainability in profiling voluntary simplifiers. Journal of Business Research, 70, 37-43.
  • Roberts, J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 217-231.
  • Roberts, J. A., & Bacon, D. R. (1997). Exploring the subtle relationships between environmental concern and ecologically conscious consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 79-89.
  • Schor, J. B. (2005). Prices and quantities: Unsustainable consumption and the global economy. Ecological Economics, 55(3), 309-320.
  • Shaw, D., & Newholm, T. (2002). Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 167-185.
  • Statista (2018) The Statistics Portal. [https://www.statista.com/statistics/183505/number-of-vehicles-in-the-united-states-since-1990/ Erişim Tarihi: 25.01.2018].
  • Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415-425.
  • Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317.
  • Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104-115.
  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 81-97.
  • Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
  • Stone, G., Barnes, J. H., & Montgomery, C. (1995). Ecoscale: a scale for the measurement of environmentally responsible consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 12(7), 595-612.
  • Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999). Environmental segmentation alternatives: A look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(6), 558-575.
  • Sütterlin, B., Brunner, T. A., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Who puts the most energy into energy conservation? A segmentation of energy consumers based on energy-related behavioral characteristics. Energy Policy, 39(12), 8137-8152.
  • Tanner, C., & Wölfing Kast, S. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by swiss consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 20(10), 883-902.
  • Thøgersen, J. (1999). Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(1), 53-81.
  • Thøgersen, J. (2000). Psychological determinants of paying attention to eco-labels in purchase decisions: Model development and multinational validation. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23(3), 285-313.
  • Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5), 605-630.
  • Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2006). The dynamic interaction of personal norms and environment‐friendly buying behavior: A panel study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1758-1780.
  • Thøgersen, J., & Grønhøj, A. (2010). Electricity saving in households—A social cognitive approach. Energy Policy, 38 (12), 7732-7743.
  • Ulusoy, E. (2016). Experiential responsible consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 284-297.
  • Umut, M. Ö., Topuz, Y. V. & Velioğlu, M. N. (2015). Çöpten geri dönüşüme giden yolda sürdürülebilir tüketiciler. Celal Bayar Ünivesitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 263-288
  • Van Raaij, W. F., & Verhallen, T. M. (1983). A behavioral model of residential energy use. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3(1), 39-63.
  • Velioğlu, M. N., Topuz, Y. V., Çoknaz, D. Ç. & Umut, M. Ö. (2015). Çevresel bir davranış olan geri dönüşüm için Türkiye’de hane halkı düzeyinde sosyal pazarlama programı geliştirme, TÜBİTAK 1002 Projesi Raporu, Proje No: 114K588.
  • Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169-194.
  • Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(20), 1580-1607.
  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (2005). The Muncy–Vitell consumer ethics scale: A modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 267-275.
  • Wackernagel, M., Onisto, L., Bello, P., Linares, A. C., Falfán, I. S. L., Garcıa, J. M., ... & Guerrero, M. G. S. (1999). National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 29(3), 375-390.
  • Wackernagel, M., Schulz, N. B., Deumling, D., Linares, A. C., Jenkins, M., Kapos, V., Monfreda, C., Loh, J., Myers, N., Norgaard, R. Randers, J., (2002) Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(14), 9266-9271.
  • Webb, D. J., Mohr, L. A., & Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its Measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 91-98.
  • Wells, V. K., Ponting, C. A., & Peattie, K. (2011). Behaviour and climate change: Consumer perceptions of responsibility. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(7-8), 808-833.
  • World Bank. (2015). World Development İndicators, 1960-2016. [http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators Erişim Tarihi: 25.01.2018].
  • World Bank. (2017). Solid Waste Management. 7 Kasım 2017. [http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/brief/solid-waste-management Erişim Tarihi: 25.01.2018].
  • Worldwatch Enstitüsü (2015) Dünyanın durumu - sürdürülebilirliğin önündeki gizli tehditlerle yüzleşmek. Çeviren: G. Hotinli. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  • Yavetz, B., Goldman, D., & Pe’er, S. (2009). Environmental literacy of pre‐service teachers in Israel: A comparison between students at the onset and end of their studies. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 393-415.
  • Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 20-31.
Birincil Dil tr
Konular İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler
Dergi Bölümü Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yazar: İnci Dursun
Kurum: Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümü
Ülke: Turkey


Yazar: Ebru Tümer Kabadayı
Kurum: Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümü
Ülke: Turkey


Yazar: Ahmet Tuğrul Tuğer (Sorumlu Yazar)
Ülke: Turkey


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { ohuiibf403831, journal = {Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {2564-6931}, address = {Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi}, year = {2018}, volume = {11}, pages = {42 - 66}, doi = {10.25287/ohuiibf.403831}, title = {Çevreci Tüketim Davranışı: Boyutları ve Ölçümü}, key = {cite}, author = {Dursun, İnci and Tümer Kabadayı, Ebru and Tuğer, Ahmet Tuğrul} }
APA Dursun, İ , Tümer Kabadayı, E , Tuğer, A . (2018). Çevreci Tüketim Davranışı: Boyutları ve Ölçümü. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (3), 42-66. DOI: 10.25287/ohuiibf.403831
MLA Dursun, İ , Tümer Kabadayı, E , Tuğer, A . "Çevreci Tüketim Davranışı: Boyutları ve Ölçümü". Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 11 (2018): 42-66 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/ohuiibf/issue/38714/403831>
Chicago Dursun, İ , Tümer Kabadayı, E , Tuğer, A . "Çevreci Tüketim Davranışı: Boyutları ve Ölçümü". Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 11 (2018): 42-66
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Çevreci Tüketim Davranışı: Boyutları ve Ölçümü AU - İnci Dursun , Ebru Tümer Kabadayı , Ahmet Tuğrul Tuğer Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - doi: 10.25287/ohuiibf.403831 DO - 10.25287/ohuiibf.403831 T2 - Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 42 EP - 66 VL - 11 IS - 3 SN - 2564-6931- M3 - doi: 10.25287/ohuiibf.403831 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.403831 Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Çevreci Tüketim Davranışı: Boyutları ve Ölçümü %A İnci Dursun , Ebru Tümer Kabadayı , Ahmet Tuğrul Tuğer %T Çevreci Tüketim Davranışı: Boyutları ve Ölçümü %D 2018 %J Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi %P 2564-6931- %V 11 %N 3 %R doi: 10.25287/ohuiibf.403831 %U 10.25287/ohuiibf.403831
ISNAD Dursun, İnci , Tümer Kabadayı, Ebru , Tuğer, Ahmet Tuğrul . "Çevreci Tüketim Davranışı: Boyutları ve Ölçümü". Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 11 / 3 (Ağustos 2018): 42-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.403831