Yıl 2018, Cilt 1, Sayı 3, Sayfalar 538 - 547 2018-10-30

PASSENGER CONFIDENCE TO BE ACHIEVED IN THE STABILITY OF STRATEGIES IN AIRPORT SECURITY
HAVALİMANI GÜVENLİĞİNDE UYGULANAN STRATEJİLER DOĞRULTUSUNDA ELDE EDİLECEK YOLCU GÜVENİ

Tüzün Tolga İNAN [1]

33 78

The concept of airport security in the world has begun to develop since the early 1970’s. Terrorist acts have increased with the intensive use of air transportation by the public since the 1970’s and fatal accidents have been experienced by this way. In civil aviation industry, the reasons for the acts of terror have been examined with the statement which named as the rules in civil aviation are written with blood. Necessary precautions have been taken to avoid similar fatal accidents in the future. Airport have became dearest related with development of civil aviation. So, strategies have evolved about terrorist acts all over the world In our work, we will examine the accidents that are the result of the security shortage in the major civil aviation industry in the world and examine the strategies applied for airport security today.
Dünyada havalimanı güvenliği kavramı 1970’li yılların başından itibaren gelişmeye başlamıştır. Sivil hava taşımacılığının 1970’li yıllardan itibaren toplum tarafından yoğun bir şekilde kullanılması ile beraber terör eylemleri artmış olup, bu doğrultuda ölümcül kazalar yaşanmıştır. Sivil havacılık endüstrisinde kurallar kanla yazılmıştır ifadesi doğrultusunda terör eylemlerinin sebepleri incelenmiş ve gelecekte benzer ölümcül kazaların olmaması için gerekli önlemler alınmıştır. Havalimanları da gelişen sivil havacılık endüstrisi içerisinde terör eylemlerinin Dünyada ses getirme amacı doğrultusunda göz bebeği olmuştur. Çalışmamızda Dünyada başlıca sivil havacılık endüstrisinde güvenlik açığı sonucu yaşanan kazaları inceleyerek, günümüzde havalimanı güvenliği için uygulanan stratejiler incelenecektir.
  • Barbash, G., Yoeli, N., Ruskin, S. ve Moeller, D. (1986). Airport preparedness for mass disaster: a proposed schematic plan. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 57(1): 77-81.
  • Comfort, L.K., Boin, A. ve Demchak, C.C. (Eds.). (2010). Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh PA.
  • Cooper, J.B. (1971). The most infamous criminal hijacking is the unsolved case of J.B. Cooper (November 24, 1971).
  • De Neufville, R. (1995). Designing airport passenger buildings for the 21st century MIT Proceedings of the ICE e Transport, 111(2): 97-104.
  • EU. (2006). European Union Aeronautics Research. ACARE Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe.
  • European Commission. (2015). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1998 of 5 November 2015 Laying Down Detailed Measures for the Implementation of the Common Basic Standards on Aviation Security.
  • FAA: Federal Aviation Agency. (2013). Airport Design and Engineering Standards. http://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/design_standards. Erişim Tarihi 08 Aralık 2017.
  • GAO: United States Government Accountability Office. (2005). Report to Congressional Committees; AVIATION FEES, Review of Air Carriers' Year 2000 Passenger and Property Screening Costs. Wash D.C.
  • Gordon, Peter, Moore II, James E., Richardson ve Harry W. (2009). Economic impact analysis of terrorism events: recent Methodological Advances and Findings. In: ITC Round Table 144.
  • Hainen, A.M., Remias, S.M., Bullock, D.M. ve Mannering, F.L. (2013). A hazard-based analysis of airport security transit times. J. Air Transp. Manag. 32: 32-38.
  • Harris, D.H. (2002). How to really improve airport security. Ergon. Des. Q. Hum. Factors Appl. 10 (1): 17-22.
  • http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-11.2/FullText.html. Erişim Tarihi 06 Aralık 2017.
  • http://www.icao.int/secretariat/PostalHistory/annex_17_security_safeguarding_international_civil_aviation_against_acts_of_unlawful_interference.html. Erişim Tarihi 06 Aralık 2017.
  • http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/programs/airports-policy-menu-71.html. Erişim Tarihi 06 Aralık 2017.
  • Horonjeff, R., McKelvey, F., Sproul, W. ve Young, S. (2009). Planning and Design of Airports, Fifth ed. MCGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Janic, M. (2007). A theory of sizing airport passenger terminals. J. Airpt. Manag. 1(2): 180-198.
  • Kirschenbaum, A., Mariani, M., Van Gulijk, C., Rapaport, C. ve Lubasz, S. (2013). Airports at risk: the impact of information sources on security decisions. J. Transp. Secur. 5(3): 187-197.
  • Langan-Fox, J., Sankey, M.J. ve Canty, J.M. (2009). Human factors measurement for future air traffic control systems. Hum. Factors. 51(5): 595-637.
  • Li, Y., Gao, X., Xu, Z. ve Xuanrui, Z. (2018). Journal of Air Transport Management, 66: 13-24.
  • Li, Y., Wu, C., Gülen, G. ve Wang, J. (2015). Network structure, perception level, and participants' welfares. Complexity, 21(1): 349-362.
  • Meservy, T.O., Jensen, M.L., Kruse, J., Burgoon, J.K., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. ve Twitchell, D.P., Metaxas, D.N. (2005). Deception detection through automatic, unobtrusive analysis of nonverbal behavior. Intell. Syst. IEEE, 20(5): 36-43.
  • National Research Council. (1996). Airline Passenger Security Screening: New Technologies and Implementation Issues. Committee on Commercial Aviation Security Panel on Passenger Screening; National Materials Advisory Board Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems. Publication NMABd482d1. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  • Patankar, M.S. ve Holscher, L. (2000). Accessibility vs security: the challenge to airport security systems. Secur. J. 13: 7-19.
  • Pitchforth, J., Wu, P., Fookes, C. ve Mengersen, K. (2015). Processing passengers efficiently: an analysis of airport processing times for international passengers. J. Air Transp. Manag. 49: 35-45.
  • Plungis, J. (2013). Airlines Get Break under U.S. Budget Deal, Not Passengers. Bloomberg News. Dec 11. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-11/security-fee-paid-by-airlines-repealed-under-u-s-budget-deal.html. Erişim Tarihi 04 Aralık 2017.
  • Podemska-Mikluch, M. ve Wagner, R.E. (2017). Economic coordination across divergent institutional frameworks: dissolving a theoretical antinomy. Rev. Political Econ. 1-18.
  • Prentice, B.E. (2015). Canadian Airport Securit: The privatization of public good, Journal of Air Transport Management, 48: 52-59.
  • Schwartz, B.L. (1974). Queuing models with lane selection: a new class of problems. Oper. Res. 22(2): 331-339.
  • Skorupski, J. ve Uchronski, P. (2018). Evaluation of the effectiveness of an airport passenger and baggage security screening system, 66: 53-64.
  • Svenson, O. ve Maule, A.J. (1993). Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Terrorism and International Transport: towards Riskbased Security Policy. OECD Publishing, Paris, France.
  • The hijacker Patrick Dolan Critton was finally arrested 30 years later. (2001). at Mt. Vernon, NY. http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/. Erişim Tarihi 04.12.2017.
  • TSA. (2011). Recommended Security Guidelines for Airport Planning Design and Construction May 2011. Transportation Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  • Weick, K.E. ve Sutcliffe, K.M. (2001). Managing the Unexpected. Jossey-Bass, New York.
  • Worley, J.A., Bailey, L.L. ve Thompson, R.C., Joseph, K.M., Williams, C.A. (2000). Organizational Communication and Trust in the Context of Technology Change. Federal Aviation Administration Oklahoma City Ok Civil Aeromedical Institute, 12.
  • Wu, P.P.Y., Pitchforth, J. ve Mengersen, K. (2014). A Hybrid Queue-based Bayesian Network framework for passenger facilitation modelling. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 46: 247-260.
Birincil Dil tr
Konular Sosyal
Yayımlanma Tarihi Ekim 2018
Dergi Bölümü Makaleler
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0002-5937-9217
Yazar: Tüzün Tolga İNAN (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: GELİŞİM MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU
Ülke: Turkey


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { rs472675, journal = {R\&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal}, issn = {}, eissn = {2630-6441}, address = {Dr. Arif YILDIZ}, year = {2018}, volume = {1}, pages = {538 - 547}, doi = {10.33723/rs.472675}, title = {HAVALİMANI GÜVENLİĞİNDE UYGULANAN STRATEJİLER DOĞRULTUSUNDA ELDE EDİLECEK YOLCU GÜVENİ}, key = {cite}, author = {İNAN, Tüzün Tolga} }
APA İNAN, T . (2018). HAVALİMANI GÜVENLİĞİNDE UYGULANAN STRATEJİLER DOĞRULTUSUNDA ELDE EDİLECEK YOLCU GÜVENİ. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal, 1 (3), 538-547. DOI: 10.33723/rs.472675
MLA İNAN, T . "HAVALİMANI GÜVENLİĞİNDE UYGULANAN STRATEJİLER DOĞRULTUSUNDA ELDE EDİLECEK YOLCU GÜVENİ". R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal 1 (2018): 538-547 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/rs/issue/40031/472675>
Chicago İNAN, T . "HAVALİMANI GÜVENLİĞİNDE UYGULANAN STRATEJİLER DOĞRULTUSUNDA ELDE EDİLECEK YOLCU GÜVENİ". R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal 1 (2018): 538-547
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - HAVALİMANI GÜVENLİĞİNDE UYGULANAN STRATEJİLER DOĞRULTUSUNDA ELDE EDİLECEK YOLCU GÜVENİ AU - Tüzün Tolga İNAN Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - doi: 10.33723/rs.472675 DO - 10.33723/rs.472675 T2 - R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 538 EP - 547 VL - 1 IS - 3 SN - -2630-6441 M3 - doi: 10.33723/rs.472675 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.33723/rs.472675 Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal HAVALİMANI GÜVENLİĞİNDE UYGULANAN STRATEJİLER DOĞRULTUSUNDA ELDE EDİLECEK YOLCU GÜVENİ %A Tüzün Tolga İNAN %T HAVALİMANI GÜVENLİĞİNDE UYGULANAN STRATEJİLER DOĞRULTUSUNDA ELDE EDİLECEK YOLCU GÜVENİ %D 2018 %J R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal %P -2630-6441 %V 1 %N 3 %R doi: 10.33723/rs.472675 %U 10.33723/rs.472675
ISNAD İNAN, Tüzün Tolga . "HAVALİMANI GÜVENLİĞİNDE UYGULANAN STRATEJİLER DOĞRULTUSUNDA ELDE EDİLECEK YOLCU GÜVENİ". R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal 1 / 3 (Ekim 2018): 538-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.33723/rs.472675