Yıl 2018, Cilt 18, Sayı 35, Sayfalar 41 - 63 2018-04-30

THE INTERACTIN BETWEEN BOREOUT, CAREER ADAPTABILITY AND FAMILY-WORK ENRICHMENT: A CASE STUDY OF SELCUK UNIVERSITY
BOREOUT, KARİYER UYUMLULUĞU VE AİLE-İŞ ZENGİNLEŞTİRME ETKİLEŞİMİ: SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ

Prof. Dr. Himmet KARADAL [1] , Yrd. Doç. Dr. A. Mohammed ABUBAKAR [2] , Ahmet Tuncay ERDEM [3]

96 739

Boreout is a psychological state of intense boredom, a crisis of meaning and growth. It is commonly associated with the lack mental stimuli which can turn employees into ‘professional zombies’. Drawing on conservation of resources (COR) theory, this article examines the impact of boreout on career adaptability, as well as the moderating effect of family–work enrichment.  Utilizing data from employees in the service industry (n=250), a structural equation modeling technique was employed. The data unveiled that (1) boreout has a negative impact on employee career adaptability,  (2) that family–work enrichment has a positive impact on employee career adaptability, and (3) that family–work enrichment does not moderates the relationship between boreout and employee career adaptability. The authors concluded that organizations should address the problematic lack of on-the-job challenges, by reevaluating job design, enriching jobs, weighing work demands, and a careful consideration of person-job fit. Implications and future research direction are discussed.

ÖZ

Boreout yoğun bir can sıkıntısı, bir anlam ve büyüme krizi olarak işgörenleri olumsuz yönde etkileyen psikolojik bir durum şeklinde ifade edilmektedir. Genel olarak işgörenleri “profesyonel zombi” haline getirebilecek zihinsel uyarı eksikliği ile birlikte ilişkilendirildiği düşünülmektedir. Kaynakların korunumu (COR) teorisine dayanarak, bu çalışmada boreoutun, kariyer uyumluluğu üzerindeki etkisinin yanı sıra aile-iş zenginleştirmesinin düzenleyici etkisi incelemektedir. Araştırmada Selçuk Üniversitesi idari personellerinden elde edilen veriler kullanarak (n = 250) yapısal eşitlik modelleme tekniği uygulanmıştır. Veriler, (1) boreout'un çalışanların kariyer uyumluluğu üzerinde olumsuz bir etkisinin bulunduğunu, (2) aile-iş zenginleştirmenin çalışanların kariyer uyumluluğunu yönde olumlu etkilediğini ve (3) aile-iş zenginleştirmenin, boreout ve çalışanların kariyer uyumluluğu arasındaki ilişkiyi düzenleyici rolünün olmadığını ortaya koymuştur. Araştırma sonucunda, örgütlerin iş tasarımını yeniden değerlendirmeleri ve işlerini zenginleştirmelerinin gerekliliği, iş taleplerinin yoğunlaştırılarak ve kişi-iş uyumuna dikkat edilerek iş başında karşılaşılan zorlukların çözülmesi gerekliliği sonuçlarına varılmıştır. Araştırma değişkenlerinin etkileri ve gelecekteki araştırma yönleri tartışılmaktadır.


Anahtar Kelimeler: Boreout, Kariyer Uyumluluğu, Aile-İş Zenginleştirme, Kaynakların Korunması Teorisi, İşgören.

Jel Kodları: M 10, M 12

  • Abubakar, A. M., Ilkan, M., & Sahin, P. (2016). eWOM, eReferral and Gender in the Virtual Community. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MIP-05-2015-0090.
  • Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory. American Psychologist, 56, 781–796.
  • Bayraktaroğlu, S. (2011) İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık.
  • Bakker, A. B., E. Demerouti, E. de Boer, W. B. Schaufeli (2003), “Job Demands and Job Resources as Predictors of Absence Duration and Frequency”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, ss. 341-356.
  • Bakker, A. B., M. van Veldhoven, and D. Xanthopoulou. (2010). Beyond the demand-control model. Thriving on high job demands and resources. Journal of Personnel Psychology 9 (1): 3–16.
  • Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, M. K., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and validation of a multidimensional measure of work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–276.
  • Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), 131-164.
  • Crouter, A. C. (1985). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work–family interface. Human Relations, 37, 425–442.
  • Cürten, S. (2013). Boreout-Syndrom und Coaching. Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching, 20 (4), 473-478.
  • Douglas, R. M., R. L. Gilson, and L. M. Harter. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 77 (1): 11–37.
  • Dutton, J. E., L. M. Roberts, and J. Bednar. (2010). Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review 35 (2): 265–93.
  • Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197.
  • Friedman, S. D., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2000). Work and family—allies or enemies? What happens when business professionals confront life choices. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI: 10.2307/3151312
  • Frone, M. R. (2003). Work–family balance. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 143–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Gecas, V. 1982. The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology 8: 1–33.
  • Grandey, A. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). The conservation of resources model applied to work–family conflict and strain. Journal of vocational behavior, 54(2), 350-370.
  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. (1999). Research on work, family, and gender: Current status and future directions. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 391–412). Thousand Oaks,CA, US: Sage.
  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review.
  • Guan, Y. J., Deng, H., Sun, J. Q.,Wang, Y. N., Cai, Z. J., Ye, L. H. (2013). Career adaptability, job search self-efficacy and outcomes: A three-wave investigation among Chinese university graduates. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 561–570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.Jvb.2013.09.003.
  • Halbesleben, J. R. B., M. R. Buckley (2004), “Burnout in Organizational Life”, Journal of Management, 30 (6), ss. 859–879.
  • Halbesleben, J. R., Harvey, J., & Bolino, M. C. (2009). Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1452.
  • Hirschi, A. (2009). Career adaptability development in adolescence: Multiple predictors and effect on sense of power and life satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(2), 145–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.Jvb.2009.01.002.
  • Hirschi, A., & Valero, D. (2015). Career adaptability profiles and their relationship to adaptivity and adapting. Journal of vocational behavior, 88, 220-229.
  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1988). The ecology of stress. New York: Hemisphere.
  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989) “Conservation Of Resources A New Attempt At Conceptualizing Stress”, American Psychologist, 44 (3), ss. 513-524.
  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, culture, and community. New York: Plenum.
  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2001), “The Influence of Culture, Community, and the Nested- Self in the Stress Rocess: Advancing Conservation of Resources Theory” Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50 (3), ss. 337-421.
  • Johnston, C. S., Luciano, E. C., Maggiori, C., Ruch, W., & Rossier, J. (2013). Validation of the German version of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale and its relation to orientations to happiness and work stress. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 295–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.002.
  • Kirchmeyer, C. (1992). Perceptions of nonwork-to-work spillover: Challenging the common view of conflict–ridden domain relationships. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 231–249.
  • Kline, R. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press
  • Kosík, K. (1979) Det konkretas dialektik: en studie i människans och världens problematik. Göteborg: Röda Bokförlaget.
  • Loukidou, L., J. Loan-Clarke, and K. Daniels. 2009. Boredom in the workplace: More than monotonous tasks. International Journal of Management Reviews 11 (4): 381–405.
  • MacKenzie, S.B., & Podsakoff, P.M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1976), “Psychometric theory (2nd ed)”. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Porfeli, E. J., & Savickas, M. L. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale-USA form: Psychometric properties and relation to vocational identity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 748–753. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.009.
  • Powell, G., & Greenhaus, J. (2004) Is the opposite of positive negative? The relationship between work– family enrichment and conflict. Academy of Management Meetings, New Orleans, LA.
  • Purohit, B. K. 2010. Leveraging the integration of sales career cycle with brand life cycle in Indian pharmaceutical firms. Ahmedabad: Research Publications, Indian Institute of Management.
  • Renn, R.W., and R. J. Vandenberg. 1995. The critical psychological states: An under-represented component in job characteristics model research. Journal of Management 21 (2): 279–304.
  • Rossier, J., Zecca, G., Stauffer, S. D., Maggiori, C., & Dauwalder, J. -P. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale in a French-speaking Swiss sample: Psychometric properties and relationships to personality and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 734–743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.004.
  • Rottinghaus, P. J., Day, S. X., & Borgen, F. H. (2005). The career futures inventory: A measure of career-related adaptability and optimism. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1),3–24.
  • Rothbard, N. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655–684. Rothlin, P., and P. Werder. 2008. Boreout! Overcoming workplace demotivation. Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page Limited.
  • Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., Panzer, K., & King, S. N. (2002). Benefits of multiple roles for managerial women. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 369–386.
  • Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661–673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011.
  • Sieber, S. D. (1974). Toward a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 39, 567–578.
  • Siu, O. L., Lu, J. F., Brough, P., Lu, C. Q., Bakker, A. B., Kalliath, T., ... & Sit, C. (2010). Role resources and work–family enrichment: The role of work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 470-480.
  • Stock, R.M. (2013). A hidden Threat of Innovativeness: Service Employee Boreout. American Marketing Association. Winter 2013 Sayısı.
  • Stock, R. M. (2015). Is boreout a threat to frontline employees' innovative work behavior?, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(4), 574–592. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12239
  • Tang, Y., Huang, X., & Wang, Y. (2017). Good marriage at home, creativity at work: Family–work enrichment effect on workplace creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, DOI: 10.1002/job.2175.
  • Tortop, N ve Aykaç, B ve Yayman, H ve Özer, M. A. (2006) İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Turner, J. C. (1982). Toward a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Social identity and intergroup relations, ed. H. Tajfel, 15–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Uğur, A. (2008) İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık.
  • Walker, D. D. (2009). Predicting service employee incivility toward customers: The roles of employee boredom, emotional exhaustion, and organizational identification (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia).
  • Wayne, J., Grzywacz, J., Carlson, & D., Kacmar, M. (2004). Work–family enrichment: A theoretical elaboration of the construct. In L. Eby (Chair), Coming of age: The new era of work–family research. Symposium conducted at the 19th annual meeting of the society of industrial/organizational psychology, Chicago, IL.
  • Wayne, J. H., Randel, A. E., & Stevens, J. (2006). The role of identity and work–family support in work–family enrichment and its work-related consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 445-461.
  • Yüksel, Ö. (2000) İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Zacher, H. (2014). Career adaptability predicts subjective career success above and beyond personality traits and core self-evaluations, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(1), 21-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/JJvb.2013.10.002.
Birincil Dil tr
Konular İşletme
Dergi Bölümü Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Yazar: Prof. Dr. Himmet KARADAL
Kurum: AKSARAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Ülke: Turkey


Yazar: Yrd. Doç. Dr. A. Mohammed ABUBAKAR
Kurum: AKSARAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Ülke: Turkey


Yazar: Ahmet Tuncay ERDEM (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: AKSARAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Ülke: Turkey


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { susead366393, journal = {Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi}, issn = {2148-3043}, eissn = {2148-3043}, address = {Selçuk Üniversitesi}, year = {2018}, volume = {18}, pages = {41 - 63}, doi = {10.30976/susead.366393}, title = {BOREOUT, KARİYER UYUMLULUĞU VE AİLE-İŞ ZENGİNLEŞTİRME ETKİLEŞİMİ: SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ}, key = {cite}, author = {ABUBAKAR, Yrd. Doç. Dr. A. Mohammed and KARADAL, Prof. Dr. Himmet and ERDEM, Ahmet Tuncay} }
APA KARADAL, P , ABUBAKAR, Y , ERDEM, A . (2018). BOREOUT, KARİYER UYUMLULUĞU VE AİLE-İŞ ZENGİNLEŞTİRME ETKİLEŞİMİ: SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 18 (35), 41-63. DOI: 10.30976/susead.366393
MLA KARADAL, P , ABUBAKAR, Y , ERDEM, A . "BOREOUT, KARİYER UYUMLULUĞU VE AİLE-İŞ ZENGİNLEŞTİRME ETKİLEŞİMİ: SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ". Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 18 (2018): 41-63 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/susead/issue/36854/366393>
Chicago KARADAL, P , ABUBAKAR, Y , ERDEM, A . "BOREOUT, KARİYER UYUMLULUĞU VE AİLE-İŞ ZENGİNLEŞTİRME ETKİLEŞİMİ: SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ". Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 18 (2018): 41-63
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - BOREOUT, KARİYER UYUMLULUĞU VE AİLE-İŞ ZENGİNLEŞTİRME ETKİLEŞİMİ: SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ AU - Prof. Dr. Himmet KARADAL , Yrd. Doç. Dr. A. Mohammed ABUBAKAR , Ahmet Tuncay ERDEM Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - doi: 10.30976/susead.366393 DO - 10.30976/susead.366393 T2 - Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 41 EP - 63 VL - 18 IS - 35 SN - 2148-3043-2148-3043 M3 - doi: 10.30976/susead.366393 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.30976/susead.366393 Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi BOREOUT, KARİYER UYUMLULUĞU VE AİLE-İŞ ZENGİNLEŞTİRME ETKİLEŞİMİ: SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ %A Prof. Dr. Himmet KARADAL , Yrd. Doç. Dr. A. Mohammed ABUBAKAR , Ahmet Tuncay ERDEM %T BOREOUT, KARİYER UYUMLULUĞU VE AİLE-İŞ ZENGİNLEŞTİRME ETKİLEŞİMİ: SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ %D 2018 %J Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi %P 2148-3043-2148-3043 %V 18 %N 35 %R doi: 10.30976/susead.366393 %U 10.30976/susead.366393
ISNAD KARADAL, Prof. Dr. Himmet , ABUBAKAR, Yrd. Doç. Dr. A. Mohammed , ERDEM, Ahmet Tuncay . "BOREOUT, KARİYER UYUMLULUĞU VE AİLE-İŞ ZENGİNLEŞTİRME ETKİLEŞİMİ: SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ". Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 18 / 35 (Nisan 2018): 41-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.30976/susead.366393