Cilt 15, Sayı 1, Sayfalar 22 - 40 2015-02-27

Examining E-Learning Barriers As Perceived By Faculty 
Members Of Engineering Colleges In The Jordanian Universities

Muhammad K. AL-ALAWNEH [1]

145 101

Employing computer's technology that includes e-learning system in the field of Engineering is a vital issue which needs to be discussed. Therefore, this study purposed to examine e-learning barriers as perceived by faculty members of engineering in three major universities in Jordan (Yarmouk University, Jordan University of Science and Technology, and Al-Balqaa Applied University) in the second semester of 2012. The study's instrument was distributed to collect the data from a sample of 176 faculty members who are involved in delivering online courses through web-based management tool. The finding of the study shows that, overall, the three barriers domains were high. However, the results show that online degree experience and the gender of participants' variables were no significant. Based on the results, the study suggested that institutions of higher education should set a vision and a strategic plan to encourage faculty members to offer online courses and provide them with training and professional development to follow up with technology.
E-learning Barriers, Higher Education, Engineering Faculty Members, Jordan.
  • Al-Alawneh, M. K.; Meqdadi, R. ; Al-Refai, A. ; Khdair, R.; Malkawi, A. (2011). Examining the effect of college type, study level, and gender of students on their use of teamwork skills as the perceived at Yarmouk University of Jordan. Canadian Social Science, 7(6), 48
  • Allen, M. Mabry, E., Mattrey, M., Bourhis, J. Titsworth, S., & Burrell, N. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta-analysis. International
  • Communication Association. Online article from: http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/k/h/khk122/woty/F2FHybridOnline/Allen%202004.pdf
  • Berg, Z. L., & Muilenburg, L. Y. (2003). Barriers to distance education: Perceptions of K-12 educators. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education
  • International Conference. Albuquerque, New Mexico. Berg, Z. L., Muilenburg, L. Y. & Haneghan, J. V. (2002). Barriers to distance education and training. Survey Results. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3 (4), 409-418.
  • Birnbaum, B. (2002). Foundations and Practices in the use of distance education.
  • Lewiston. NY: Edwin Mellon Press. Cross, P. (1981). Adults as learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Farmer, E., and Rojewski, J. (Eds.). (2001). Research pathways: Writing professional papers, theses, and dissertations in workforce education. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
  • Daniel, J. S. (1996). Mega-universities and knowledge media: Technology strategies for higher education. London: Kogan Page
  • Dillon, C. L., & Walsh, S. M. (1992). Faculty: The neglected resource in distance education.
  • The American Journal of Distance Education,3 (6), 5-21. Dooley, K., Patil, B., & Lineberger, R.D. (2000). An evaluation of a multidisciplinary course delivered at a distance: Prescriptive principles to challenge our profession. San
  • Diego, CA: Proceedings of the 27 th Annual Agricultural Education Research Conference (ERIC Document Reproduction No. 449 351). Exter, M., Harlin, N., and Bichelmeyer, B. (2008). Story of a conference: Distance education students' experiences in a departmental conference. Internet and Higher Education 11, (2008) 42–52.
  • Fann, N., & Lewis, S. (2001). Is online education the solution? Business Education Forum, 55 (4), 46-48.
  • Flowers, J. (2001). Online learning needs in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 13 (1), 17-30.
  • Franklin, N., & Kaufman, D. (1999). Transforming faculty for distance learning. Proceeding of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, USA, 15, 271-274.
  • Furst-Bowe, J. (2001). Identifying The Needs of Adult Women in Distance Learning
  • Program. International Journal of Instructional Media,28 (4). Galusha, J. (1998). Barriers to learning in distance education. Hattiesburg, MS: The University of Southern Mississippi. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 416 377).
  • Hall, J. (1996). The convergence of means. Education Review, 30 (4), 42-45.
  • Hanson, D., Maushak, N. J., Schlosser, C. A., Anderson, M. L., Sorensen, C., & Simonson, M. (1997). Distance Education: Review of the Literature (2nd ed.). Bloomington,
  • Indiana: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Harroff, P. A. (2002). Dimensions of quality for web-based adult education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Georgia.
  • Jonassen, D.H., Peck, K.L., & Wilson, B.G. (1999). Learning With Technology: A
  • Constructivist Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc. Jones, G. R. (1997). Cyberschools. Englewood, CO: Jones Digital Century.
  • Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge
  • Melton, R. F. (2002). Planning and Developing Open and Distance Learning, Routledge Falmer, NY.
  • Ministry of Higher Education Annual Report (2011\2012). From: http://www.mohe.gov.jo/Statistics/tabid/69/language/ar-JO/Default.aspx
  • Monolescu, D., Schifter, C. & Greenwood, L. (2004). The Distance Education Evolution:
  • Issues and Case Studies. Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA. Moor. M. G. (1973). Toward a Theory of independent Learning and Teaching, Journal of Higher Education, 44:661-79.
  • Moore. M. G. (1987). Self-directed learning and distance education. Journal of Distance Education1 (1), pp. 7-24.
  • Moore, M.G. (1994). Autonomy and interdependence. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 1-5.
  • Moor, M G. (1998). ‘Introduction,’ in Gibson, C. C. (ed) Distance learner in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes, Madison: Atwood publishing, 1-7.
  • Ndahi, H. (1999). Utilization of distance learning technology among industrial and technical teacher education faculty. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 36(4), 22-33.
  • Neighbors, L., S. (2004). Apart but a Part in Adult Distance Study: Persistence in an Online
  • Cohort Graduate Certificate Program. (Doctoral Dissertation, university of Wisconsin 2004). dissertation Abstract International.
  • Picciano A. G., (2001), Distance Learning (making connections across virtual space and time), Prentice-Hall. Inc, New Jersey. International Journal of instructional Media; 2005 vol. 32 issue 2, 143-156.
  • Prudy, L. N. (1986). Tele course: Using technology to serve distance learners. In G.H. Vogel
  • (Ed), Advances in Instructional Technology.(pp. 3-12) New directions for community college. No.55 San Francisco; Jossey-Bass. Rezabek, R. J. (1999). A Study of the Motives, Barriers, and enablers Affecting
  • Participation in Adult Distance Education Classes in an Iowa Community College (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Northern Iowa, 1999). Dissertation Abstract International AAT 99303
  • Rowntree, D. (1992). Exploring Open and Distance Learning, London: Kogan Page.
  • Saud, M. S., Shu'aibu, B., Yahya, N. and Yasin, A. (2011). Effective integration of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in technical and vocational education and training (TVET) toward knowledge management in the changing world of work.
  • African Journal of Business Management, 5 (16), 6668-6673.
  • Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2000). Teaching and learning at a distance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
  • Tas, E. M. (2010). ICT education for development- a case study. Procedia Social Behavior and Science. Elsevier Ltd, 3: 507-512. van Dusen, G. C. (2000). Digital dilemma: Issues of access, cost, and quality in media- enhanced and distance education. Washington, D.C. : Office of Education Research and Improvement (ERIC document Reproduction No. 443371).
  • Warburton, S. (2009). Second life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (30), 414-426.
  • Wlodkowski, R., J. (1993). Enhance Adult Motivation to Learn. Jossey-Pass Inc. San
  • Francisco, California. Weiner, B. (1980) Human Motivation, New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winson.
  • Winner, L. (1998, June 2). Tech knowledge review. NETFUTURE: Technology and human responsibility, 72, 4-10.
  • Willen, B. (1984). Self-directed learning and distance education. Can Distance Education be a good alternative for the self-directed learners? (ERIC) Document Reproduction No. Ed 24
  • Wolcott, L. (1999). Assessing faculty beliefs about rewards and incentives in distance education. Pilot study results. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (ERIC Document Reproduction No. 435271).
  • Yap, K. (1996). Distance education in the Pacific Northwest: Program benefits and implementation barriers. New York: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research
  • Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. 395 563) Zielinski, D. (2000). Can you keep learners online? Training, 37 (3), 64-75.
  • Zirkle. C. (2002). Identification of distance education barriers for trade and industrial teacher education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 40 (1), 20-44.
  • Zirkle. C. (2003). Access barriers in distance education. Contemporary Education 72 (2), 39
  • Zirkle, C. (2004). Utilization of distance education in two-year colleges: Implication for technical education. American Technical Education Association (ATEA), 31 (4), 12-14.
Birincil Dil en
Konular
Dergi Bölümü Articles
Yazarlar

Yazar: Muhammad K. AL-ALAWNEH
E-posta:

Bibtex @ { tojde175927, journal = {Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education}, issn = {1302-6488}, address = {Anadolu Üniversitesi}, year = {2015}, volume = {15}, pages = {22 - 40}, doi = {10.17718/tojde.21352}, title = {Examining E-Learning Barriers As Perceived By Faculty 
Members Of Engineering Colleges In The Jordanian Universities}, language = {en}, key = {cite}, author = {AL-ALAWNEH, Muhammad K.} }
APA AL-ALAWNEH, M . (2015). Examining E-Learning Barriers As Perceived By Faculty 
Members Of Engineering Colleges In The Jordanian Universities. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15 (1), 22-40. DOI: 10.17718/tojde.21352
MLA AL-ALAWNEH, M . "Examining E-Learning Barriers As Perceived By Faculty 
Members Of Engineering Colleges In The Jordanian Universities". Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 15 (2015): 22-40 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/tojde/issue/16891/175927>
Chicago AL-ALAWNEH, M . "Examining E-Learning Barriers As Perceived By Faculty 
Members Of Engineering Colleges In The Jordanian Universities". Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 15 (2015): 22-40
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Examining E-Learning Barriers As Perceived By Faculty 
Members Of Engineering Colleges In The Jordanian Universities AU - Muhammad K. AL-ALAWNEH Y1 - 2015 PY - 2015 N1 - doi: 10.17718/tojde.21352 DO - 10.17718/tojde.21352 T2 - Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 22 EP - 40 VL - 15 IS - 1 SN - 1302-6488- M3 - doi: 10.17718/tojde.21352 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.17718/tojde.21352 Y2 - 2017 ER -
EndNote %0 Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education Examining E-Learning Barriers As Perceived By Faculty 
Members Of Engineering Colleges In The Jordanian Universities %A Muhammad K. AL-ALAWNEH %T Examining E-Learning Barriers As Perceived By Faculty 
Members Of Engineering Colleges In The Jordanian Universities %D 2015 %J Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education %P 1302-6488- %V 15 %N 1 %R doi: 10.17718/tojde.21352 %U 10.17718/tojde.21352