Cilt 14, Sayı 4, Sayfalar 176 - 195 2015-02-27

Academic Dishonesty In Distance Higher Education: 
Challenges And Models For Moral Education In The Digital Era

Mohammad Imam FARISI [1]

138 213

Today, in the era of open access to digital-based information and communication, one of the biggest challenges in higher education to realize moral education and to build academic culture and integrity is the emergence of academic dishonesty behaviors among academic members. The paper describes academic dishonesty behaviors in Distance Higher Education (DHE) institutions within the context of moral education in the digital era. The paper reviews the results of the research on academic dishonesty behaviors and practices in DHE institutions worldwide; factors which have a very significant role for the emergence of academic dishonesty behaviors and practices. It is also discusses an integrated model of moral education as interdisciplinary strategy in combating academic dishonesty and in promoting academic culture and integrity in DHE.
Academic Dishonesty, Distance Higher Education, Moral Education Model
  • Academic Board Policy of the University of Sydney-ABPUS. (2010). Academic dishonesty and plagiarism. Retrieved February 21, 2013 from UG/Plagiarism.pdf
  • Acxiom. (2011). Experiences verifying the identity of distance learning students: Third annual report on identity in distance learning. AR: Acxiom Corporation. Retrieved
  • March 19, 2013 from paper.pdf
  • Adkins, J., Kenkel, C., & Lim, Ch. L. (2005). Deterrents to online academic dishonesty.
  • The Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 17-22. Anitha, C., & Harsha, T. S. (2013). Ethical perspectives in open and distance education.
  • Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 14(1), 193-201. Apampa, K. M., Wills, G., & Argles, D. (2010). User security issues in summative e- assessment security. International Journal of Digital Society (IJDS), 1(2), 135-147.
  • Appanna, S., & Goundar, S. (2012). Plagiarism in New Zealand – When the “hand of management” shakes. Proceedings at the 5th International Plagiarism Conference, 16
  • – 18 July, Sage Gateshead, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Baggaley, J. (2012). Plagiarism: cross-cultural and genealogical perspectives.
  • Proceedings at the 5th International Plagiarism Conference, 16 – 18 July, Sage Gateshead, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Bailie, J. L., & Jortberg, M. A. (2009). Online learner authentication: Verifying the identity of online users. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 197- 20
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bauer, H. H. (1995, December 5). Ethics in science. Retrieved February 21, 2013 from
  • Becker, D., Connolly, J., Lentz, P., & Morrison, J. (2006). Using the business fraud triangle to predict academic dishonesty among business students. Academy of
  • Educational Leadership Journal, 10(1), 37-54. Bedford, Q. W., Gregg, J. R., & Clinton, M. S. (2011). Preventing online cheating with technology: A pilot study of remote proctor and an update of its use. Journal of Higher
  • Education Theory and Practice, 11(2), 41-58. Bedford, W., Gregg, J., & Clinton, S. (2009). Implementing technology to prevent online cheating: A case study at a Small Southern Regional University (SSRU).
  • MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 230-238. Black, E. W., Greaser, J., & Dawson, L. (2008). Academic dishonesty in traditional and online classrooms: does the “media equation” hold true? Journal of Asynchronous
  • Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 23-30. Bombaro & Mitchell (2012). Doing honest work: A campuswide approach. Paper presented at the 5th international plagiarism conference, gateshead, United Kingdom, July 16-18, 2012.
  • Brey, P. (2003). Ethical issues for the virtual university. Retrieved August 27, 2011 from
  • Brey, P. (2006). Social and ethical dimensions of computer-mediated education.
  • Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society, 4(2), 91-102. Brown, T. (2008). Ethics in elearning. Revista de Educação do Cogeime, 17(32/33), 211-2
  • Bunn, D. N., Caudill, S. B., & Gropper, D. M. (1992). Crime in the classroom: An economic analysis of undergraduate cheating behavior. Journal of Economic
  • Education, Summer ed., 197-207. Butakov, S., Dyagilev, V., & Tskhay, A. (2012). Protecting students’ intellectual property in the web plagiarism detection process. The International Review of
  • Research in Open and Distance Learning-IRRODL, 13(5), 1-19. Cano, C. R., & Sams, D. (2009). Advancing cognitive moral development: A field observation of college students. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 3(special section), 1-16.
  • Carpenter, D. D., Harding, T. S., Finelli, C. J., Montgomery, S. M., & Passow, H. J. (2006). Engineering students’ perception of and attitudes towards cheating. Journal of
  • Engineering Education, 95(3), 181-194. Christe, B. (2003). Designing online courses to discourage dishonesty: Incorporate a multilayered approach to promote honest student learning. Educause Quarterly. 4, 54
  • Coalter, T., Lim, Ch. L., & Wanorie, T. (2007). Factors that influence faculty actions: A study of faculty responses to academic dishonesty. International Journal for the Scholarship of teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1-21.
  • Community College Leadership Forum-CCLF. (2011). Maintaining academic integrity in online courses: Custom research brief. The Advisory Board Company. Washington, D.C.
  • Curnow, Ch. K., Freeman, M.W., Wisher, R.A., & Belanich, J. (2002). Training on the web: Identifying and authenticating learners. Virginia: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
  • Dane, F.C., & Granzow, S. (2012). Promoting academic integrity: A review of research on university honor codes. Retrieved March 16, 2013 from Research_Review_050802.doc
  • Dietz-Uhler, B., & Hurn, J. (2011). Academic dishonesty in online courses. ASCUE
  • Proceedings. Retrieved February 21, 2013 from
  • Dryer, K. A. (2010). Challenges of maintaining academic integrity in an age of collaboration, sharing and social networking. TCC 2010 Proceedings. Retrieved
  • January 23, 2013 from
  • Dueber, B., & Misanchuk, M. (2001). Sense community In a distance education course.
  • Paper at Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference Murfreesboro, TN, April 8-10. Retrieved february 21, 2013 from http://Billdueber.Com/Dueber-Misanchuk.Pdf.
  • Ellis, C. (2012). Streamlining plagiarism detection: The role of electronic assessment management. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 8(2), 46-56.
  • Engler, J.N., Landau, J.D., & Epstein, M. (2008). Keeping up with the joneses: Students’ perceptions of academically dishonest behavior. Teaching of Psychology, 35: 99–102.
  • Eshet, Y., Grinautski, K., & Peled, Y. (2012). Learning motivation and student academic dishonesty: A comparison between face-to-face and online courses. Proceedings of the Chais conference on instructional technology research 2012: Learning in technology era. (pp. 22-29). Raanana: The Open University of Israel.
  • Florida Institute of Technology. FIT. (2010). Student handbook. RetrievedFebruary 21, 2013 from studenthandbook/print.php.
  • Frank, A. J. (2010). Dependable distributed testing: Can the online proctor be reliably computerized? Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Business (ICE-B),
  • Athens, Greece, 26-28 July 2010.
  • Gallant, T.B., & Drinan, P. (2006). Organizational theory and student cheating:
  • Explanation, responses, and strategies. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 839-860. Gearhart, D. (2001). Ethics in distance education: Developing ethical policies. Online
  • Journal of Distance Learning Administration, IV(1). Retrieved March 21, 2013 from
  • Gibbs, J. P. (1975). Crime, punishment, and deterrence. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Grijalva, Th.C., Kerkvliet, J., & Nowell, C. (2013). Academic honesty and online courses. Retrieved March 17, 2013 from pap.pdf
  • Hall, C.W. (2008). Revealing online deception: The discrepancy between deceptive belief and practice online. Retrieved February 23, 2013 from bitstream/1813/11059/2/Cameron_Hall_Research_Honors_Thesis.pdf
  • Hancock, J. T. (2007). Digital deception. Why, when and how people lie online. In
  • Joinson, A., McKenna, K., Postmes, T. and Reips, U. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. (pp. 289-301). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Harding et al. (2007). The theory of planned behavior as a model of academic dishonesty in engineering and humanities undergraduates. Ethics & Behavior, 17(3),
  • Heberling, M. (2002). Maintaining academic integrity in online education. Online
  • Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(1). Heyman, F.A., et al., (2012). Can we rely on text originality check systems? Evaluation of three systems used in higher education and suggestion of a new methodological test approach. Proceedings at the 5th International Plagiarism Conference. the Sage
  • Gateshead, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 16- Wednesday 18 July 2012. Retrieved Mach 19, 2013 from
  • Howell, S. L., Sorensen, D., & Tippets, H. S. (2009). The new (and old) news about cheating for distance educators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(3).
  • Iyer, R. and Eastman, J.K. (2006). Academic dishonesty: Are business students different from other college students? Journal of Education for Business, November/December, 101-110.
  • Jocoy, Ch., & DiBiase, D. (2006). Plagiarism by adult learners online: A case study in detection and remediation. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1), 1-15.
  • Johnston, B. (2003). The concept of plagiarism. Learning and Teaching in Action, 2(1). Spring 2003.
  • Jone, D. L. R. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business
  • Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141-150. Jones, L.R. (2011). Academic integrity & academic dishonesty: A handbook about cheating & plagiarism. Melbourne, Florida: Florida Institute of Technology.
  • Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 233– 2
  • Jumani, N. B., Rahman, F., Iqbal, A., & Chishti, S. H. (2011). Factors to improve written assignments in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), 4-13.
  • Kansas State University. (2003). Kansas College Gives First "XF" Grade to Plagiarist.
  • Community College Week. Retrieved March 18, 2013 from kansasstate.pdf
  • Kaplan, W., & Mable, P. (1998). Students' perceptions of academic integrity: Curtailing violations. In D. D. Burnett, L. Rudolph & K. O. Clifford (Eds.), Academic integrity matters (pp. 22–31). Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, Inc.
  • Keegan, D. (2002). ZIFF PAPIERE 119. The future of learning: From elearning to mlearning. Hagen: FernUniversitat.
  • Kelley, K.B., & Bonner, K. (2005). Digital text, distance education and academic dishonesty: faculty and administrator perceptions and responses. Journal of
  • Asynchronous Learning Networks – JALN, 9(1), 43-52. Kerka, S., Wonacott., M. (2000). Assessing Learners Online. Practitioner File. ERIC, ED 4482 Retrieved March 21, 2013 from
  • Kirschenbaum, H. (1992). A comprehensive model for values education and moral education. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10), 771-776.
  • Krsak, A.M. (2007). Curbing academic dishonesty in online courses. TCC 2007
  • Proceedings. Retrieved March 17, 2013
  • Kulmala, D. (2010). Meta-Collaboration: Writing with Students to Engage Learning.
  • Faculty Focus. Retrieved January 25, 2010 from collaborationwriting-with-students-to-engage-learning
  • Marais, E., Minnaar, U., & Argles D. (2006). Plagiarism in e-learning systems: Identify- ing and solving the problem for practical assignments. In Proceedings of the Sixth
  • IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT ’06) (pp. 822–824). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society. Maruca, L. (2003). Plagiarism and its (disciplinary) discontents: Towards an interdisciplinary theory and pedagogy. Issues in Integrative Studies, 21, 74-97.
  • McCabe, D. L. (1993). Faculty responses to academic dishonesty: The influence of student honor codes. Research in Higher Education 34 (5): 647–658.
  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L.K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522-538.
  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic Integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: a qualitative investigation. Journal of Higher Education. 70(2), 211-234.
  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L.L & Butterfield, K.D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.
  • McGee, P. (2013). Supporting academic honesty in online courses. The Journal of
  • Educators Online, 10(1), 1-31. Niels, G.J. (1997). Academic practices, school culture and cheating behavior. Retrieved
  • March 17, 2013 from cheating.pdf
  • Ohler, J. (2011). Digital citizenship means character education for the digital age.
  • Kappa Delta Pi Record, 25-27. Olt, M. R. (2009). Seven strategies for plagiarism-proofing discussion threads in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 222-229.
  • Olt, M.R. (2002). Ethics and distance education: Strategies for minimizing academic dishonesty in online assessment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3).
  • Plagiarism Today. (2012). 5 key takeaways from the 5th international plagiarism conference. Retrieved March 16, 2013 from
  • Puccioni, M., & Huffman, L. (2008). Distance education best practices guide. San
  • Fransisco: Los Medanes Collage and the Distance Education Committee. Raines, D.A., et al. (2011). Cheating in online courses: The student definition. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 11(1), 80-89.
  • Ravasco, G. G. (2012). Technology-aided cheating in open and distance e-learning.
  • Asian Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 71-77. Roberts, C. J., & Hai-Jew, S. (2009). Issues of academic integrity: An online course for students addressing academic dishonesty. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 182-196.
  • Rovai, A.P., & Lucking, R. (2005). Sense community in a higher education television- based distance education program. Educational Technology Research and Development. 51(2). 5-16,DOI:10.1007/BF02504523.
  • Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense community at a distance. International Review
  • Research In Open and Distance Learning. 3(1). Rowe, N. C. (2004). Cheating in online student assessment: Beyond plagiarism. Online
  • Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(2). Schaefer, T., Barta, M., & Pavone, T. (2009). Student identity verification and the higher education opportunity act: A faculty perspective. International Journal of
  • Technology and Distance Learning, 6(8), 51-58. Schiller, E. I. (2002). Education, mentality and culture in the internet era. Bucharest:
  • Christian University. Sheard, J., Carbone, A., & Dick, M. (2002). Determination of factors which impact on IT students’ propensity to cheat. In T. Greening & R. Lister (Eds.). Proceedings of
  • Australian Computing Education Conference (AACEC), Adelaide, Australia. Retrieved March 17, 2013 from
  • Shils, E. (1981). Kaum Cendekiawan. D. Hartoko, (Ed.). Golongan Cendekiawan:
  • Mereka yang Berumah di Angin. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia. Shyles, L. (2002). Authenticating, Identifying, and Monitoring Learners in the Virtual
  • Classroom: Academic integrity in distance learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association (88th, November 21-24, 2002, New Orleans, LA).
  • Sileo, J. M., & Sileo, T. W. (2008). Academic dishonesty and online classes: A rural education perspective. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27(1/2), 55-60.
  • Spafford, E.H. (2011). Security, technology, publishing, and ethics (part II). Computers & Security, 30(1), 2–3.
  • Spaulding, M. (2009). Perceptions of academic honesty in online vs. face-to-face classrooms. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3), 183-198.
  • Stephens, J.M., Young, M.F., & Calabrese, Th. (2007). Does moral judgment go offline when students are online? A comparative analysis of undergraduates’ beliefs and behaviors related to conventional and digital cheating. Ethic & Behavior, 17(3), 233- 2
  • Steutel, J.W. (1997). The virtue approach to moral education: Some conceptual clarifications. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 31(3), 395-407.
  • Suller, J. (2005). The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied
  • Psychoanalytic Studies, 2(2), 184-188. Synder, L. G., & Cannoy, S. D. (2010). Business communication: Instructional strategies to prevent plagiarism. Business Education Forum, 65, 23-25.
  • Taylor, J. C. (2001). Fifth generation distance education. Keynote address, ICDE 20th world conference, April 1.5, Dusseldorf, Germany. Retrieved March 14, 2010 from
  • The USD University Academic Affairs Council. (2003). Proposal to Create XF/XW
  • Grades. Retrived March 19, 2013 from 05-07AAC_8.A.3_XF- XW_grades.pdf
  • Toner, C.N., Toner, J.F., & White, R.C. (2000). Lies, Deception and heroification and a midwife's tale and the social web: The class book web course interdisciplinary faculty development project at the University of Maine. South African Journal of Information
  • Management, 2(2/3). Retrieved February 22, 2013. from SAJIM/.../100
  • Toprak, E., Ozkanal, B., Aydin, S., & Kaya, S. (2010). Ethics in elearning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 78-86.
  • Trenholm, S. (2007). A review of cheating in fully asynchronous online courses: A math or fact-based course perspective. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3), 281-300.
  • U.C. Davis. (2008). What is academic integrity? Office of student judicial affairs.
  • Retrieved from January 26, 2010
  • UNESCO. (2006, June 11–13). Open educational resources: Deliberations of a community of interest. Lillehammer, Norway: ICDE SCOP.
  • Valentine, K. (2006). Plagiarism as literacy practice: Recognizing and rethinking ethical binaries. College Composition and Communication. 58(1),89-109.
  • Vilchez, M., & Thirunarayanan, M.O. (2011). Cheating in online courses: A qualitative study. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 8(1).
  • WCET, UT Telecampus & Instructional Technology Council. (2009). Best practices strategies to promote academic integrity in online education. Retrieved February 21, 2013 from
  • Weeks, C. (2009). Schools look to push new punishment for cheaters. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved January 15, 2013 from to-push-new-punishment-for-cheaters/article1251548
  • Whitler, Jr, B.E., & Kost, C.R. (2006). College students’ perceptions of peers who cheat.
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(8), 1559-1816.
  • Wichita State University. (2005). XF/XW grade policy. distance education. Wichita
  • State University. Retrieved March 18, 2013 from grade.htm
  • Wikipedia. (2013b). Honor code. Retrieved March 16, 2013 from Honor_code.
  • Williams, J.B. (2003). Plagiarism: Deterrence, detection and prevention. J. Houston &
  • D. Whigham (Eds). The Handbook for Economics Lecturers. UK: University of Bristol. Yeo, S., & Chien, R. (Eds). (2005). Academic Integrity at Curtin: Students guidelines for avoiding plagiarism. Australia: Learning Support Network.
Birincil Dil en
Dergi Bölümü Articles

Yazar: Mohammad Imam FARISI

Bibtex @ { tojde176100, journal = {Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education}, issn = {1302-6488}, address = {Anadolu Üniversitesi}, year = {2015}, volume = {14}, pages = {176 - 195}, doi = {}, title = {Academic Dishonesty In Distance Higher Education: 
Challenges And Models For Moral Education In The Digital Era}, language = {en}, key = {cite}, author = {FARISI, Mohammad Imam} }
APA FARISI, M . (2015). Academic Dishonesty In Distance Higher Education: 
Challenges And Models For Moral Education In The Digital Era. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14 (4), 176-195. Retrieved from
MLA FARISI, M . "Academic Dishonesty In Distance Higher Education: 
Challenges And Models For Moral Education In The Digital Era". Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 14 (2015): 176-195 <>
Chicago FARISI, M . "Academic Dishonesty In Distance Higher Education: 
Challenges And Models For Moral Education In The Digital Era". Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 14 (2015): 176-195
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Academic Dishonesty In Distance Higher Education: 
Challenges And Models For Moral Education In The Digital Era AU - Mohammad Imam FARISI Y1 - 2015 PY - 2015 N1 - DO - T2 - Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 176 EP - 195 VL - 14 IS - 4 SN - 1302-6488- M3 - UR - Y2 - 2017 ER -
EndNote %0 Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education Academic Dishonesty In Distance Higher Education: 
Challenges And Models For Moral Education In The Digital Era %A Mohammad Imam FARISI %T Academic Dishonesty In Distance Higher Education: 
Challenges And Models For Moral Education In The Digital Era %D 2015 %J Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education %P 1302-6488- %V 14 %N 4 %R %U