Cilt 18, Sayı 2, Sayfalar 68 - 79 2017-04-01

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MOBILE PHONE USAGE FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING, ATTITUDE, AND PERFORMANCE

Marites Piguing HILAO [1] , Saovapa WICHADEE [2]

177 37

Mobile phone technology that has a huge impact on students’ lives in the digital age may offer a new type of learning. The use of effective tool to support learning can be affected by the factor of gender. The current research compared how male and female students perceived mobile phones as a language learning tool, used mobile phones to learn English and developed their learning performance. A five-point rating scale questionnaire was used to collect data from 122 students, comprising 65 females and 57 males. They were enrolled in a fundamental English course where mobile phone usage was integrated in certain language learning tasks with an aim to facilitate learning. The findings demonstrated that male and female students did not differ in their usage, attitudes toward mobile phone uses for language learning as well as their learning performance at a significance level. In addition, the constraints of using mobile phone for learning that students identified in an open-ended question included the small screen and keyboard the most, followed by intrusiveness of SMS background knowledge, and limited memory of mobile phone. The implication for classroom practice was proposed in how mobile phone can be fully incorporated into the instructional process in order to enhance learner engagement. The results of this study are important for teachers when implementing the mobile phone technology in language teaching. They can be used as a guideline of how mobile phone can be fully incorporated into the instructional process in order to enhance learner engagement.

M-learning,mobile phone use,classroom teaching,higher education,mobile technology
  • Al-Fahad, F. N. (2009). Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 111-119. Beranuy, M., Oberst, U. Carbonell, X., & Chamarro, A. (2009). Problematic Internet and mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students: the role of emotional intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1182–1187. Bianchi A., Phillips J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyber Psychology Behavior, 8(1):39–51. Billieux, J., Van Der Linden, M., & Rochat, L. (2008). The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(9), 1195– 1210. Brown, L. (2008). Using Mobile Learning to Teach Reading to Ninth-Grade Students. Ph.D dissertation Capella University, USA. Available Online at http://gradworks.umi.com/ 3330949.pdf Cavus, N. (2011). Investigating mobile devices and LMS integration in higher education: student perspectives. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1469-1474. Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Going to the MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9–16. Cuing, G., & Wang, S. (2008). Adoption cell phones in EFL Teaching and Learning. Retrieved October 31, 2012 from www.notworthprinting.wordpress.com/ category/mobile-learning. Craig, T., & Van Lorn, M. (2009). Impact Constructivist Learning Theory and MobileTechnology Integration. [Academic]. Theories of Educational Technology, 12, 1-12. Cobcroft, R. S., Towers, S. J., Smith, J. E., & Bruns, A. (2006). Mobile learning in review: Opportunities and challenges for learners, teachers and institutions. In Proceedings Online Learning and Teaching (OLT) Conference 2006, (pp.21-30). Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology. Donaldson, R.L. (2011). Student acceptance of mobile learning. Dissertation. The Florida State University College of Communication & Information. Retrieved April 26, 2012 from http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-05312011074842/ unrestricted/Donaldson_ R_dissertation_2011.pdf. Grellhesl, M., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2012). Using the uses and gratifications theory to understand gratifications sought through text messaging practices of male and female undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2175–2181. Hong, F. Y., Chiu, S. I., & Lin, H. Y. (2012). The development and current states of private college student mobile phone addiction scale. Chung Cheng Educational Studies, 11(1), 87–116. Hoppe, M. (2009). Mobile learning and Education application www.pervasive. Retrieved October 31, 2012 from wiwi.unidue.de/.../hoppe_mobile-learning-and-educ/ Junco R., Merson D., & Salter D. W. (2010). The effect of Gender, ethnicity, and income on college students’ use of communication technologies. Cyber Psychology Behavior, 13(6), 619–627. Kafyulilo, A. (2012). Access, use and perceptions of teachers and students towards mobile phones as a tool for teaching and learning in Tanzania. Retrieved October 31, 2012 from http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-012-9207- yEducational and information technologies journal Kizito, N.R, (2012). Pre testing Mathematical Concepts with the Mobile Phone: Implications for Curriculum Design. Retrieved October 31, 2012 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1065/2075 Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction.ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289. Mitra A., Willyard J., Platt C., & Parsons, M. (2005). Exploring web usage and selection criteria among male and female students. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (3). Retrieved August 2, 2014 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/mitra.html. Kwon, S.K., & Chidambaram, L. (2000). A Test of the Technology Acceptance Model: The Case of Cellular Telephone Adoption. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Hawaii. Lan, Y. F., & Sie, Y. S. (2010). Using RSS to support mobile learning based on media richness theory. Computers & Education, 55(2), 723-732.
  • Lemish, D., & Cohen, A. (2005). On the gendered nature of mobile phone culture in Israel. Sex Roles, 52(7/8), 511-522. Low, L., & O’Connel, M. (2006). Learner-centric design of digital mobile learning. Retrieved January 22, 2013fro http://online.cit.act.edu.au/mlearning/lowoconnell2006.pdf Muhanna, W., & Abu-Al-Sha’r, A. (2009). University Students' Attitudes towards Cell Phone Learning Environment. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 3(4). Omede, J., & Achor, E. (2015). Gender dimensions in the use of mobile phone SMS on note taking and comprehension of audio-taped lecture materials in Kogi State of Nigeria. Research Journal of Educator, 1(1), 8-14. Rahamat, R., Shah, P., Din, R., & Aziz, J. A. (2011). Students’ readiness and perceptions towards using mobile technologies for learning the English language literature components. Retrieved August, 31, 2012 from http://www.melta.org.my/ET/2011/69_84_Rashidah%202011.pdf Serrano-Santoyo, A., & Organista-Sandoval, J. (2010, November). Challenges and opportunities to support learning with mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 3rd Mexican Workshop on Human Computer Interaction (pp.8587). Universidad Politécnica de San Luis Potosí. Valk, J.H., Rashid, A., & Elder, L. (2010). Using mobile phones to improve educational outcomes: An analysis of evidence from Asia. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 117–140. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Walsh, S. P., White, K. M., Cox, S., & Young, R. M. (2011). Keeping in constant touch: the predictors of young Australians' mobile phone involvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 333–342. Zhang, Y. X. (2002). Comparison of Internet attitudes between industrial employees and college students. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5(2), 143-149.
Konular
Dergi Bölümü Articles
Yazarlar

Yazar: Marites Piguing HILAO
E-posta: marites.h@bu.ac.th
Ülke: Thailand


Yazar: Saovapa WICHADEE
E-posta: saovapa.w@bu.ac.th
Ülke: Thailand


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { tojde306558, journal = {Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education}, issn = {1302-6488}, address = {Anadolu Üniversitesi}, year = {2017}, volume = {18}, pages = {68 - 79}, doi = {10.17718/tojde.306558}, title = {GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MOBILE PHONE USAGE FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING, ATTITUDE, AND PERFORMANCE}, language = {en}, key = {cite}, author = {WICHADEE, Saovapa and HILAO, Marites Piguing} }
APA HILAO, M , WICHADEE, S . (2017). GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MOBILE PHONE USAGE FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING, ATTITUDE, AND PERFORMANCE. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18 (2), 68-79. DOI: 10.17718/tojde.306558
MLA HILAO, M , WICHADEE, S . "GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MOBILE PHONE USAGE FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING, ATTITUDE, AND PERFORMANCE". Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 18 (2017): 68-79 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/tojde/issue/28675/306558>
Chicago HILAO, M , WICHADEE, S . "GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MOBILE PHONE USAGE FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING, ATTITUDE, AND PERFORMANCE". Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 18 (2017): 68-79
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MOBILE PHONE USAGE FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING, ATTITUDE, AND PERFORMANCE AU - Marites Piguing HILAO , Saovapa WICHADEE Y1 - 2017 PY - 2017 N1 - doi: 10.17718/tojde.306558 DO - 10.17718/tojde.306558 T2 - Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 68 EP - 79 VL - 18 IS - 2 SN - 1302-6488- M3 - doi: 10.17718/tojde.306558 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.17718/tojde.306558 Y2 - 2016 ER -
EndNote %0 Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MOBILE PHONE USAGE FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING, ATTITUDE, AND PERFORMANCE %A Marites Piguing HILAO , Saovapa WICHADEE %T GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MOBILE PHONE USAGE FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING, ATTITUDE, AND PERFORMANCE %D 2017 %J Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education %P 1302-6488- %V 18 %N 2 %R doi: 10.17718/tojde.306558 %U 10.17718/tojde.306558