Yıl 2018, Cilt 19, Sayı 1, Sayfalar 4 - 17 2018-01-01

Mobile Learning According to Students of Computer Engineering and Computer Education: A Comparison of Attitudes

Deniz Mertkan GEZGİN [1] , Muge ADNAN [2] , Meltem ACAR GUVENDIR [3]

96 56

Mobile learning has started to perform an increasingly significant role in improving learning outcomes in education. Successful and efficient implementation of m-learning in higher education, as with all educational levels, depends on users’ acceptance of this technology. This study focuses on investigating the attitudes of undergraduate students of Computer Engineering (CENG) and Computer Education and Instructional Technology (CEIT) departments in a Turkish public university towards m-learning from three perspectives; gender, area of study, and mobile device ownership. Using a correlational survey method, a Mobile Learning Attitude Scale (MLAS) was administered to 531 students, analysis of which revealed a positive attitude to m-learning in general. A further investigation of the aforementioned three variables showed a more positive attitude for female students in terms of usability, for CEIT students in terms of advantages, usability and independence, and for those owning a mobile device in terms of usability. An important implication from the findings, among others, is supplementing Computer Engineering curriculum with elective courses on the fundamentals of mobile learning, and/or the design and development of m-learning software, so as to create, in the long run, more specialized and complementary teams comprised of trained CENG and CEIT graduates in m-learning sector.

M-learning, education, attitude, mobile programming, mobile technologies
  • Albert, L. J., & Johnson, C. S. (2011). Socioeconomic Status – and Gender-Based Differences in Students’ Perceptions of E-Learning Systems. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9(3), 421-436. Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93-102. Al-Fahad, F. N. (2009). Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 111-119. Ally, M. (2004). Using learning theories to design instruction for mobile learning devices. Proceedings of the Mobile Learning 2004 International Conference, Rome. Ally, M. (2007). Guest Editorial-Mobile Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2) Alshalabi, I., & Elleithy, K. (2012). Effective M-learning design Strategies for computer science and Engineering courses. International Journal of Mobile Network Communications & Telematics (IJMNCT), 2(1). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.1897. Alwraikat, M. A., & Al Tokhaim, H. (2014). Exploring the Potential of Mobile Learning Use among Faculty Members. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 8(3), 4-10. Baya’a, N. F., & Daher, W. M. (2009). Learning Mathematics in an Authentic Mobile Environment: The Perceptions of Students.iJIM, 3(SI), 6-14. Buyukozturk, S., Cakmak, E. K., Akgun, O. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2008).Bilimsel arastırma yontemleri [Scientific Research Methods].Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Academy Publishing. Cavus N. (2011). Investigating mobile devices and LMS integration in higher education: student perspectives. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1469-1474. Cavus, N., & Uzunboylu, H. (2009). Improving critical thinking skills in mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 434-438. Chen, B., & Denoyelles, A. (2013). Exploring Students’ Mobile Learning Practices in Higher Education. Educause Review Online. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/exploringstudents-mobile-learningpractices-higher-education. Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054-1064. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Celik, U. A. (2013). M-Ogrenme Tutum Olcegi: Gecerlik ve Guvenirlik Analizleri [MLearning Attitude Scale: Validity and Reliability Analyses]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(4), 172-185. 15 Elcicek, M., & Bahceci, F. (2015). The Research of the Vocational School Student’s Attitudes towards Mobile Learning. The Journal of Education Faculty Sakarya University, 30, 17-33. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design & evaluate research in education (4th Ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill. Gonzalez-Gomez, F., Guardiola, J., Rodríguez, O. M., & Alonso, M. A. M. (2012). Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 58, 283-290. Gupta, M., & Manjrekar, P. (2012). Using mobile learning to enhance quality in higher education. SIES Journal of Management, 8(1), 23-30. Huizenga, J., Admiraal, W., Akkerman, S., & Dam, G. T. (2009). Mobile game‐based learning in secondary education: engagement, motivation and learning in a mobile city game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(4), 332-344. Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031. Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., & Ke, H. R. (2011). An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2272-2280. Jacob, S., & Issac, B. (2014). Mobile learning culture and effects in higher education. IEEE Education Society, 2(2), 19-21. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.4379. Jaradat, R. M. (2014). Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards using m-learning for French language learning: A case study on Princess Nora University. International Journal of Learning Management Systems, 2(1), 33-44. Karasar, N. (2012).Bilimsel arastırma yontemi: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler [Scientific Research Methods: Concepts, principles, techniques]. Ankara, Turkey, Nobel Publication Distribution. Karsenti, T., & Fievez, A. (2013). The iPad in education: Uses, benefits and challenges – A survey of 6,057 students and 302 teachers in Quebec, Canada. Montreal, QC: CRIFPE. Keegan, D. (2005). The incorporation of mobile learning into mainstream education and training. World Conference on Mobile Learning, Cape Town (p.11), October. Retrieved from http://www.mlearn.org/mlearn2005/CD/papers/keegan1.pdf. Khaddage, F., & Knezek, G. (2013). iLearn via mobile technology: A comparison of mobile learning attitudes among university students in two nations. In proceedings of 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), (pp. 256-258). IEEE. Kinash, S., Brand, J., & Mathew, T. (2012). Challenging mobile learning discourse through research: Student perceptions of Blackboard Mobile Learn and iPads. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 639-655. Kukul, V., Gokcearslan S., &Karademir, T. (2015). Pre-service Teacher’s Attitude on Mobile Learning. In proceedings of Teaching and Education Conference, Amsterdam. International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences (pp. 119-127) (No. 2404091). Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2007). Mobile usability in educational contexts: what have we learnt? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2), 1-16. Kutluk, F. A., & Gulmez, M. (2014). A research about mobile learning perspectives of university students who have accounting lessons. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 291-297. 16 Leech, N.L. Barlett, K.C. & Morgan, G.A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics; use and interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Liaw, S., & Huang, H. (2015). How factors of personal attitudes and learning environments affect gender difference toward mobile learning acceptance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4), 104- 132. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2355. MacCallum, K. S., & Kinshuk, A. (2008). Mobile Discussion Boards: An Analysis on Mobile Collaboration. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 2(1), 5- 9. Mertler, C. A., & Vanatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (3rd Ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrzcak Publishing. Milosevic, I., Zivkovic, D., Manasijevic, D., & Nikolic, D. (2015). The effects of the intended behavior of students in the use of M-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 207-215. O’Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J. P., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., & Lefrere, P. (2003). MOBIlearn WP4 – Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment. Retrieved from http://www.mobilearn.org/download/results/guidelines.pdf. Ozdamli, F., & Cavus N. (2011). Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 937-942. Ozdamli F., Soykan, E., & Yildiz, E. P. (2013). Are Computer Education Teacher Candidates Ready for M-Learning? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 1010-1015. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.188. Ozdamli, F., & Uzunboylu, H. (2015). M‐learning adequacy and perceptions of students and teachers in secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 159-172. Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using spss for windows. Australia: Australian Copyright. Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 78-102. Pfeiffer, V. D., Gemballa, S., Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2009). Situated Learning in the Mobile Age: Mobile Devices on a Field Trip to the Sea.ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 17(3), 187-199. Quinn, C. (2000). mLearning: Mobile, wireless, in-your-pocket learning. LiNE Zine, Fall 2000.Retrieved fromhttp://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqmmwiyp.htm. Rossing, J. P, Miller, W. M., Cecil, A. K., & Stamper, S. E. (2012). iLearning: The Future of Higher Education? Student Perceptions on Learning... Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 1-26. Sarac, A. (2014). Yeni bir egitim platformu olarak mobil ogrenme ortamları icin uygulama gelistirmenin onemi ve ogretim teknologu adaylarının algıları uzerine bir arastırma [The Importance Of Application Development For The Mobile Learning Environments As A New Education Platform And A Research On Instructional Technologist Candidates's Perceptions](Master’s Thesis, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/367843. Sarrab, M. (2015). Mobile Learning (m-learning) Concepts, Characteristics, Methods, Components: Platforms and Frameworks. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Schwabe, G., & Goth, C. (2005). Mobile learning with a mobile game: design and motivational effects. Journal of computer assisted learning, 21(3), 204-216. 17 Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34(3), 177-193. Shon, J. G. (2008). M-Learning Trends in Korea. Presentation at the ISO/IEC JTEC1/SC36 Open Forum, Seoul, Korea, March 2008. Suki, N. M., & Suki, N. M. (2011a).Using Mobile Device for Learning: From Students’ Perspective.US-China Education Review, A1 (1), 44-53. Suki, N. M., & Suki, N. M. (2011b). Users’ Behavior towards Ubiquitous M-Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(3), 118-129. Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2013). Online multimedia learning with mobile devices and desktop computers: An experimental test of Clark’s methods-not-media hypothesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 639-647. Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, Pearson Education, Inc. Taleb, Z., & Sohrabi A. (2012). Learning on the move: the use of mobile technology to support learning for university students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1102-1109. Tan, T-H., & Liu, T-Y. (2004). The Mobile-based interactive learning environment (MOBILE)and a case study for assisting elementary school English learning. In IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings. (pp. 530-534). IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357471 Toteja, R., & Kumar, S. (2012). Usefulness of M-devices in education: A survey, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 538-544. Uzunboylu, H., Cavus, N., & Ercag, E. (2009). Using mobile learning to increase environmental awareness. Computers & Education, 52(2), 381-389. Wang, Y.S., Wu, M.C., &Wang, H.Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118. Wu, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Su, L. H., & Huang, Y. M. (2012). A Context-Aware Mobile Learning System for Supporting Cognitive Apprenticeships in Nursing Skills Training. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 223-236. Yang S. (2012). Exploring college students’ attitudes and self-efficacy of mobile learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 148-154. Yilmaz, Y. (2011).Mobil ogrenmeye yonelik lisansustu ogrencilerinin ve ogretim elemanlarının farkındalık duzeylerinin arastırılması [Investigating the Awareness Levels of Postgraduate Students and Academics towards Mobile Learning] (Master’s thesis, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey).Retrieved from http://acikerisim.deu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/12345/7189 Zaldivar, A., Tripp, C., Aguilar, J. A., Tovar, J. E., & Anguiano, C. E. (2015). Using Mobile Technologies to Support Learning in Computer Science Students. Latin America Transactions, IEEE (Revista IEEE America Latina), 13(1), 377-382.
Konular Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
Dergi Bölümü Articles
Yazarlar

Yazar: Deniz Mertkan GEZGİN (Sorumlu Yazar)
E-posta: mertkan@trakya.edu.tr

Yazar: Muge ADNAN
E-posta: muge@mu.edu.tr

Yazar: Meltem ACAR GUVENDIR
E-posta: meltemacar@trakya.edu.tr

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { tojde382653, journal = {Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education}, issn = {1302-6488}, address = {Anadolu Üniversitesi}, year = {2018}, volume = {19}, pages = {4 - 17}, doi = {10.17718/tojde.382653}, title = {Mobile Learning According to Students of Computer Engineering and Computer Education: A Comparison of Attitudes}, key = {cite}, author = {ADNAN, Muge and ACAR GUVENDIR, Meltem and GEZGİN, Deniz Mertkan} }
APA GEZGİN, D , ADNAN, M , ACAR GUVENDIR, M . (2018). Mobile Learning According to Students of Computer Engineering and Computer Education: A Comparison of Attitudes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19 (1), 4-17. DOI: 10.17718/tojde.382653
MLA GEZGİN, D , ADNAN, M , ACAR GUVENDIR, M . "Mobile Learning According to Students of Computer Engineering and Computer Education: A Comparison of Attitudes". Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 19 (2018): 4-17 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/tojde/issue/34638/382653>
Chicago GEZGİN, D , ADNAN, M , ACAR GUVENDIR, M . "Mobile Learning According to Students of Computer Engineering and Computer Education: A Comparison of Attitudes". Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 19 (2018): 4-17
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Mobile Learning According to Students of Computer Engineering and Computer Education: A Comparison of Attitudes AU - Deniz Mertkan GEZGİN , Muge ADNAN , Meltem ACAR GUVENDIR Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - doi: 10.17718/tojde.382653 DO - 10.17718/tojde.382653 T2 - Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 4 EP - 17 VL - 19 IS - 1 SN - 1302-6488- M3 - doi: 10.17718/tojde.382653 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.17718/tojde.382653 Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education Mobile Learning According to Students of Computer Engineering and Computer Education: A Comparison of Attitudes %A Deniz Mertkan GEZGİN , Muge ADNAN , Meltem ACAR GUVENDIR %T Mobile Learning According to Students of Computer Engineering and Computer Education: A Comparison of Attitudes %D 2018 %J Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education %P 1302-6488- %V 19 %N 1 %R doi: 10.17718/tojde.382653 %U 10.17718/tojde.382653