Review of Methods of Social Network Analysis
Sosyal Ağ Analizi Yöntemlerine Bir Bakış

Mehmet Gençer [1]

82 1139

Ağ analizi yöntemleri sosyal bilimlerin birçok alanındaki araştırmalarda önemi bir katkı potansiyeli içermektedir. Bu makalede ağ analizi yaklaşımının özellikleri ve olası katkıları özetlenmektedir. Sosyal sistemlerin incelenmesi için ağ analizi yaklaşımı bileşen odaklı analiz yaklaşımlarının tamamlayıcısı olarak konumlandırılmaktadır. Bu yaklaşımın ve ilgili yöntemlerin açıklayıcı potansiyeli gerek literatür gerekse örnekler üzerinden sergilenmektedir. Ağ analizi için analiz konusu olgunun odaklanması, verilerin toplanması, ve bu verilerden üretilebilecek temel metriklerin özgün anlamları incelenmektedir.

  • Bastian, Mathieu, Sebastien Heymann, and Mathieu Jacomy. 2009. “Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks.” In International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/view/154.
  • Bender-Demoll, Skye, and Daniel A Mcfarland. 2006. “The art and science of dynamic network visualization.” Journal of Social Structure 7 (2): 1–38. Borgatti, Stephen P, and Pacey C Foster. 2003. “The network paradigm in Organizational research: A review and typology.” Journal of Management 29 (6): 991–1013.
  • Borgatti, Stephen P, Ajay Mehra, Daniel J Brass, and Giuseppe Labianca. 2009. “Network Analysis in the Social Sciences.” Science 323 (5916): 892–95. doi:10.1126/science.1165821.
  • Borgatti, Stephen P., and Martin G. Everett. 2006. “A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality.” Social Networks 28 (4): 466–84. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005. Brandes, Ulrik, and Bobo Nick. 2011. “Asymmetric relations in longitudinal social networks.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17 (12): 2283–90. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2011.169.
  • Burt, Ronald. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Coleman, James S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94. The University of Chicago Press: pp. S95–S120. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243.
  • Cross, Rob, and Andrew Parker. 2004. The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations. Hardcover; Harvard Business School Press. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike07-20{\&}path=ASIN/1591392705.
  • Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Ann Mische. 1998. “What Is Agency?” The American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2782934.
  • Freeman, Linton C. 1978. “Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification.” Social Networks 1 (3): 215–39. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
  • Gencer, Mehmet. 2007. “Increasing Modularity of Production in Computer Markets: Common Business Strategies and the Case of IBM Eclipse Project.” Proceedings of the International Coloquium on Business and Management. http://mgencer.com/files/ICBM2007.pdf.
  • Gençer, Mehmet. 2007. “Increasing Modularity of Production in Computer Business: Common Strategies and the Case of IBM Eclipse Project.” In Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Business & Management. http://mgencer.com/files/ICBM2007.pdf.
  • Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” The American Journal Of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.
  • Granovetter, Mark. 2005. “The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1): 33–50.
  • Gulati, Ranjay. 1995. “Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 619–57.
  • Gulati, Ranjay, and Martin Gargiulo. 1999. “Where do Inter-organizational Networks Come From?” American Journal of Sociology 104 (5): 1439–93.
  • Kogut, Bruce. 2000. “The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure.” Strategic Management Journal 21: 405–25.
  • Kogut, Bruce Mitchel. 2012. “The Small world of corporate governance.” In The Small Worlds of Corporate Governance, 1–52.
  • Krackhardt, David. 1987. “Cognitive social structures.” Social Networks 9 (2): 109–34. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(87)90009-8.
  • Lazer, David, Alex Pentland, Lada Adamic, Sinan Aral, Albert-Laszlo Barabasi, Devon Brewer, Nicholas Christakis, et al. 2009. “Computational Social Science.” Science 323 (5915): 721–23. doi:10.1126/science.1167742.
  • Marin, Alexandra, and Barry Wellman. 2010. “Social Network Analysis: An Introduction.” In Handbook of Social Network Analysis, 11–25. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
  • Mcpherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-lovin, and James M Cook. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–44. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
  • Moreno, J L, and Helen Hall. Jennings. 1934. Who shall survive? : a new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Book. Nervous; Mental Disease Publishing Co., Washington, D. C. :
  • Nooy, Wouter de, Andrej Mrvar, and Vladimir Batagelj. 2005. Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences). Paperback; Cambridge University Press. http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike04-20{\%}7B{\&}{\%}7Dpath=ASIN/0521602629.
  • Orr, Julian E. 2006. “Ten years of talking about machines.” Organization Studies 27 (12): 1805–20.
  • Padgett, John F. 2010. “Open Elite? Social Mobility, Marriage, and Family in Florence, 1282–1494.” Renaissance Quarterly 63 (2). The University of Chicago Press: 357–411. doi:10.1086/655230.
  • Scott, John. 2000. Social Network Analysis. Sage.
  • Silvester, Joanne, Neil R Anderson, and Fiona Patterson. 1999. “Organizational culture change: An inter-group attributional analysis.” Journal of Occupational and
  • Organizational Psychology 72 (1). Wiley Online Library: 1–23.
  • Turan, Selahattin, and Dilek Aktan. 2008. “Okul hayatinda var olan ve olmasi düşünülenlen sosyal değerler.” Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 6 (2): 227–59.
  • Wasserman, Stanley, and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis. Cambridge.
  • Wellman, David, and Julian E. Orr. 1997. Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Vol. 26. 5. doi:10.2307/2655659.
  • Wenger, Etienne. 1998. “Communities of practice: Learning as a social system.” Systems Thinker, June.
Konular
Dergi Bölümü Makaleler
Yazarlar

Orcid: orcid.org/0000-0003-1717-8668
Yazar: Mehmet Gençer
Kurum: İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi
Ülke: Turkey


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { yssr334638, journal = {Yildiz Social Science Review}, issn = {2149-4363}, address = {Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi}, year = {}, volume = {3}, pages = {19 - 34}, doi = {}, title = {Sosyal Ağ Analizi Yöntemlerine Bir Bakış}, key = {cite}, author = {Gençer, Mehmet} }
APA Gençer, M . (). Sosyal Ağ Analizi Yöntemlerine Bir Bakış. Yildiz Social Science Review, 3 (2), 19-34. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/yssr/issue/33542/334638
MLA Gençer, M . "Sosyal Ağ Analizi Yöntemlerine Bir Bakış". Yildiz Social Science Review 3 (): 19-34 <http://dergipark.gov.tr/yssr/issue/33542/334638>
Chicago Gençer, M . "Sosyal Ağ Analizi Yöntemlerine Bir Bakış". Yildiz Social Science Review 3 (): 19-34
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Sosyal Ağ Analizi Yöntemlerine Bir Bakış AU - Mehmet Gençer Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - DO - T2 - Yildiz Social Science Review JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 19 EP - 34 VL - 3 IS - 2 SN - 2149-4363- M3 - UR - Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Yildiz Social Science Review Sosyal Ağ Analizi Yöntemlerine Bir Bakış %A Mehmet Gençer %T Sosyal Ağ Analizi Yöntemlerine Bir Bakış %D 2018 %J Yildiz Social Science Review %P 2149-4363- %V 3 %N 2 %R %U
ISNAD Gençer, Mehmet . "Sosyal Ağ Analizi Yöntemlerine Bir Bakış". Yildiz Social Science Review 3 / 2 19-34.